ADVERTISEMENT

Are we going to rename the White House?

You’re just mad that somebody called out your use of ghetto jive which you tried to pass off as Dutch, for God’s sake. What a damned joke, you and the other simpleton using Dutch here, that’s sidesplittingly funny, two disingenuous illiterates.
Again, show me where I have used that. I’ll wait.
Psssst...you won’t be able to find it Lolol.
You’re just making up lies because you’re mad that you were wrong. Lol. Be mad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nice marmot
You’re the one who said it was Dutch the simpleton was speaking. Look up “disingenuous”.
I never said that he was speaking Dutch, actually. I was simply showing you that millennials did not make up the usage of “u” for short form of the word “you.” Looks like you were wrong again!
 
Are you confused that this forum is texting? Why don't you buy a full-sized keyboard for forum use? Do you think the inability to type out "you" makes you look smart?
No,no,yes. I will make sure I keep using letters for words now that I know it bothers U. Seems U have thin skin deadluckdog So if someone from the ghetto wants to participate on here. U not going to allow it. How does that work?
 
Last edited:
I refuse to discuss language any further with two Illiterate Ebonics speakers.
My granddaughter uses letters for words all the time in informal settings. U saying the chat is formal? Booowha. She was a grad of UGA a couple of years ago. I will take her education over some old fart that probably got in with a 930 sat. U ever think that young people think different from U because they are smarter?
 
Have you ever seen me use that on here? I’ll go ahead and tell you that you haven’t. It’s ok. I know you’re mad because you were wrong. And some people can’t handle new information, such as yourself. Even if it wasn’t the Dutch word for “you,” which it is, a Boomer had been saying it for years before texting was a thing. And people used it way before then, as well. So.... just take the information.
Would Jesus Like you or (U) acting like you or (U) are superior to others?
 
Socialism is not feasible. If any of the liberals on here can display any example of it working out, then I might begin to take some of what you all say a bit more seriously. The fact is that the politicians that you support, support socialism. Believe me, they know it doesn't work either, but why you ask? They already have power so when everything tanks, because socialism dreadfully fails every single time, people will beg for them to "give" them something, anything.

Now any counter argument to that is FOS and that is all there is to it. That is their endgame and if you guys ascribe to it, then you are with them and that is where civil discourse ends for me. For most americans, this neurotic, hysterical movement threatens their way of life, and while they now remain quiet, soon they won't, very soon.
 
Not acting like I’m superior to others. I gave information to help and the person was mad that I gave it. Giving information isn’t acting superior. Lol
You certainly were and do portray that terrible trait. I’m sure you are a nice guy on some level, but you have to come on this board and post as if you are some know it all on all subjects. You certainly let us all know we are not correct but, you always are correct. If you dropped the smug I’m better than you act, you may have more playmates. I know you are not interested in making friends, you just want to show your prideful ways and your school bought knowledge. Carry on.
 
You certainly were and do portray that terrible trait. I’m sure you are a nice guy on some level, but you have to come on this board and post as if you are some know it all on all subjects. You certainly let us all know we are not correct but, you always are correct. If you dropped the smug I’m better than you act, you may have more playmates. I know you are not interested in making friends, you just want to show your prideful ways and your school bought knowledge. Carry on.
Nah. Giving information isn’t acting superior. I’m not a “know-it-all on all subjects.” However, I do know a lot about some subjects. The guy I was replying to said something that was wrong. So I gave him information so he would know in the future. He was mad that I gave him information, and he continued to give false information. Such as saying that “u” is not a word for “you” in the Dutch language, which is most certainly is. In fact, I believe you liked that comment of his. He also said that I use “u” instead of “you,” which I don’t. He said that I was saying the person in question was speaking Dutch, which I never said. And many more false statements. If the guy would’ve just taken the information instead of being so stubborn when information is given, like MANY on this board, it would’ve been ok. He also hurled obscene insults and called me names because he was mad at the new information given. You liked those comments of his, as well. The fact that you’re here trying to talk down to me for giving information, while sticking up for the stubborn gentleman who couldn’t take the information and continue to spout lies and call obscene names, speaks volumes. Have a wonderful day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: celticdawg
Nah. Giving information isn’t acting superior. I’m not a “know-it-all on all subjects.” However, I do know a lot about some subjects. The guy I was replying to said something that was wrong. So I gave him information so he would know in the future. He was mad that I gave him information, and he continued to give false information. Such as saying that “u” is not a word for “you” in the Dutch language, which is most certainly is. In fact, I believe you liked that comment of his. He also said that I use “u” instead of “you,” which I don’t. He said that I was saying the person in question was speaking Dutch, which I never said. And many more false statements. If the guy would’ve just taken the information instead of being so stubborn when information is given, like MANY on this board, it would’ve been ok. He also hurled obscene insults and called me names because he was mad at the new information given. You liked those comments of his, as well. The fact that you’re here trying to talk down to me for giving information, while sticking up for the stubborn gentleman who couldn’t take the information and continue to spout lies and call obscene names, speaks volumes. Have a wonderful day.
It’s in your response, you do post and let it be known you are correct and everyone that disagrees with you should be reminded of that opinion. I and most others prefer a spirited debate with the holier than thou attitude less obvious in the delivery. That’s why I liked his post, he continued to fight the implied God complex of your post, letting him know there was NO WAY you were not correct. Carry on.
 
It’s in your response, you do post and let it be known you are correct and everyone that disagrees with you should be reminded of that opinion. I and most others prefer a spirited debate with the holier than thou attitude less obvious in the delivery. That’s why I liked his post, he continued to fight the implied God complex of your post, letting him know there was NO WAY you were not correct. Carry on.
What he was saying was not a matter of opinion. “U” being a Dutch word for “you” is not an opinion. It’s a fact. Me not using “u” as short-form for “you” is not an opinion. It’s a fact. Me never saying that the person in question was using Dutch is not an opinion. It’s a fact. So, what was he “fighting” against, in reality? His “fighting” was not over an opinion. It’s not over disagreeing. It was over him not being able to accept the factual information that was given to him. Have a great day!
 
  • Like
Reactions: celticdawg
What he was saying was not a matter of opinion. “U” being a Dutch word for “you” is not an opinion. It’s a fact. Me not using “u” as short-form for “you” is not an opinion. It’s a fact. Me never saying that the person in question was using Dutch is not an opinion. It’s a fact. So, what was he “fighting” against, in reality? His “fighting” was not over an opinion. It’s not over disagreeing. It was over him not being able to accept the factual information that was given to him. Have a great day!
I rest my case. Carry on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deadduckdawg
What he was saying was not a matter of opinion. “U” being a Dutch word for “you” is not an opinion. It’s a fact. Me not using “u” as short-form for “you” is not an opinion. It’s a fact. Me never saying that the person in question was using Dutch is not an opinion. It’s a fact. So, what was he “fighting” against, in reality? His “fighting” was not over an opinion. It’s not over disagreeing. It was over him not being able to accept the factual information that was given to him. Have a great day!
Are you really dense enough to believe that simpleton was using the informal Dutch word for "you" on this board? Why is that the only Dutch word you two use? It's ****ing illiterate ebonics and you know it and support it and ridiculously claim he is using the Dutch pronoun. What a joke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnnyBeeDawg
You certainly were and do portray that terrible trait. I’m sure you are a nice guy on some level, but you have to come on this board and post as if you are some know it all on all subjects. You certainly let us all know we are not correct but, you always are correct. If you dropped the smug I’m better than you act, you may have more playmates. I know you are not interested in making friends, you just want to show your prideful ways and your school bought knowledge. Carry on.
I asked U if U rented out boogoloo in martha's vineyard. If U do would U rent to a minority?
 
Are you really dense enough to believe that simpleton was using the informal Dutch word for "you" on this board? Why is that the only Dutch word you two use? It's ****ing illiterate ebonics and you know it and support it and ridiculously claim he is using the Dutch pronoun. What a joke.
I know U are very used to ebonics bawana. U being a village owner and all.
 
Are you really dense enough to believe that simpleton was using the informal Dutch word for "you" on this board? Why is that the only Dutch word you two use? It's ****ing illiterate ebonics and you know it and support it and ridiculously claim he is using the Dutch pronoun. What a joke.
I never said he was using any Dutch, at all. Also, I’ve never used “u” instead of “you.” You continue to give false statements. What a joke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: celticdawg
I know U are very used to ebonics bawana. U being a village owner and all.
Yes, that is correct. Fortunately, I do not have to hear it any more because I keep you and the other guy on ignore. Yesterday I made the mistake of unignoring you briefly to see to whom somebody was responding, and then I started the argument over "U", which I regret. Do you speak other Dutch words, like maybe "C"?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnnyBeeDawg
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT