of killing Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. With no racial animus, I have always been thoroughly convinced that he was guilty.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course he was guilty. There was literally a trail of blood going back to his apartment where they found his bloody shoes.of killing Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. With no racial animus, I have always been thoroughly convinced that he was guilty.
Is your question whether I think he was “not guilty” or whether I think he was “innocent” because those are two separate questions.of killing Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. With no racial animus, I have always been thoroughly convinced that he was guilty.
Is this serious. There is no doubt.of killing Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. With no racial animus, I have always been thoroughly convinced that he was guilty.
of killing Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. With no racial animus, I have always been thoroughly convinced that he was guilty.
Slow day I seeof killing Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. With no racial animus, I have always been thoroughly convinced that he was guilty.
You're such a lawyer, and of course I mean that with all due respect.Is your question whether I think he was “not guilty” or whether I think he was “innocent” because those are two separate questions.
I don’t have to guess whether he was not guilty. A jury determined he was in fact not guilty.
An easy fix to our system would be to change verdicts to “proven beyond a reasonable doubt” and “not proven beyond a reasonable doubt”.
Spoken like a true defense attorney.Is your question whether I think he was “not guilty” or whether I think he was “innocent” because those are two separate questions.
I don’t have to guess whether he was not guilty. A jury determined he was in fact not guilty.
An easy fix to our system would be to change verdicts to “proven beyond a reasonable doubt” and “not proven beyond a reasonable doubt”.
I think the incompetence part is 95 percent of it.He killed her but the combo of incompetent cops/prosecutors and racial issues at the time ruined the case
Oh he 100% killed them. There’s no questionSpoken like a true defense attorney.
Rephrase: Do you think he dunnit or nah?
And a combination of the two with FuhrmanI think the incompetence part is 95 percent of it.
I happened to be home for lunch when the prosecutors STUPIDLY had him try on the gloves. I was screaming at the TV. That opened the door.He killed her but the combo of incompetent cops/prosecutors and racial issues at the time ruined the case
That's true. Crazy case. I watched the Netflix series and got really into it last year or whenever it was. Really learned that fact through that process.Oh he 100% killed them. There’s no question
I just want people to understand that “not guilty” ≠ innocent
Guilty. Verdict was a joke. I lived off Peter street at the time of the verdict and our cable went out about 45 mins before it was delivered. Coincidence?of killing Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. With no racial animus, I have always been thoroughly convinced that he was guilty.
Leave it up to you lawyers, ha!Is your question whether I think he was “not guilty” or whether I think he was “innocent” because those are two separate questions.
I don’t have to guess whether he was not guilty. A jury determined he was in fact not guilty.
An easy fix to our system would be to change verdicts to “proven beyond a reasonable doubt” and “not proven beyond a reasonable doubt”.
GUILTY and its not really a debate. If you have any doubts just watch this for a refresher....of killing Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. With no racial animus, I have always been thoroughly convinced that he was guilty.
The DA lost this case when he decided to use the venue of downtown LA instead of in the suburbs where OJ lived and “a jury of his peers” could be seated.There are current videos of jurors who are today saying that they knew that he murdered the two but that they pulled a jury nullifcation because of the Rodney King scenario, among other things. So the jurors admit he should have been found guilty, but they nullified the verdict.
The prosecution team botched the case on a million levels, but none more than just over-trying it. By trying to preempt every possible defense, they made it nauseatingly long and invited jurors to be overwhelmed. A case study on how not to try a case.There are current videos of jurors who are today saying that they knew that he murdered the two but that they pulled a jury nullifcation because of the Rodney King scenario, among other things. So the jurors admit he should have been found guilty, but they nullified the verdict.
If one has studied the facts of the case at all, the evidence is as iron clad as any murder case could possibly be. He’s guilty not just beyond any reasonable doubt, but beyond any doubt.of killing Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. With no racial animus, I have always been thoroughly convinced that he was guilty.