meanwhile, at the Limestone mine in Pennsylvania.. LOL. you CANNOT make this stuff up
So that should stop them from doing it now? This is good no matter how much you hate them.Would be lower if not for trump 1.0....my friend...
Yeah the TDS gets worse when it is cloudy and rainy.Your TDS is really active today. LOL this post will go down in history but not for a good reason... LOL
Throwing lies up against the wall and seeing what sticks.That doesn't make any sense. Literally all the opinion polls approve of what he's doing. What "unpolled" groups are not happy? Do you have any data to back up your assertion?
Posted without comment.1). Did you watch the PC? You are a smart guy. There was nothing in that PC that should do anything but have Americans nodding in approval and address the panic sound bites from the left.
2) The issue of government waste and a desire to audit and cut it out is near universal. It is about accountability. That’s it.
3) If and when good uses of dollars are cut and impact the majority of Americans negatively, let me know. Until then like most things in the Trump admin, let it play out and see how the real outcome compares to the doomsday prognostications.
I would argue as it relates to mandates, Trumps 50 percent is anchored by tens of millions of folks who just couldn’t vote for the man but agree with the policy.
Let it play out. To date all that has been done is an effort to find government waste. If it turns into something bad we will all know it. About time we took a private sector fiduciary and accountability approach to government.
0.0% of the Constitution is dedicated to giving Congress the power to run education in the United States.49.2% of the vote, a slim majority in the Senate and the slimmest majority in the House in almost one hundred years is not a mandate from the voters to completely destroy or defund major programs or departments. Elon and Trump repeating it over and over again doesn't make it true.
Oh, and Musk admitted the condoms to Gaza story was a lie, while acknowledging that his statements in the future will continue to require factchecking. How about just making more of an effort to be truthful as you personally decide which programs and spending are worthwhile and which are not?
Musk has gotten exactly what he spent $280m to get. Maybe the wealthiest man in the world, who continues to own and run three for-profit business (one of which will live or die based entirely on US government policy and dollars) and has vowed to become the world’s first trillionaire, will in fact operate as a benign benefactor, driven only by the best interests on the country as a whole
Jimmy Carter received 50.1% of the popular vote, pretty similar to what Donald Trump received in 2024, in the election, securing his presidency, during which he signed the Department of education into law.49.2% of the vote, a slim majority in the Senate and the slimmest majority in the House in almost one hundred years is not a mandate from the voters to completely destroy or defund major programs or departments. Elon and Trump repeating it over and over again doesn't make it true.
Oh, and Musk admitted the condoms to Gaza story was a lie, while acknowledging that his statements in the future will continue to require factchecking. How about just making more of an effort to be truthful as you personally decide which programs and spending are worthwhile and which are not?
Musk has gotten exactly what he spent $280m to get. Maybe the wealthiest man in the world, who continues to own and run three for-profit business (one of which will live or die based entirely on US government policy and dollars) and has vowed to become the world’s first trillionaire, will in fact operate as a benign benefactor, driven only by the best interests on the country as a whole. Wouldn’t that be neat.
You should probably check your sources (you're literally doing what you have criticized others for), since it doesn't exactly align with what your "posted without comment" is actually trying to emphasize:
0.0% of the Constitution is dedicated to giving Congress the power to run education in the United States.
Therefore that is a power granted to the people and the individual states, per the ninth and tenth amendments to said COTUS, much like running healthcare or retirement plans.
Jimmy Carter received 50.1% of the popular vote, pretty similar to what Donald Trump received in 2024, in the election, securing his presidency, during which he signed the Department of education into law.
You brought up Congress, and admittedly, Congress was heavily democratic at that time. No argument there.
Congress gets its powers from the constitution, and liberals are screaming from hilltops that we are in a constitutional crisis so (checks the COTUS……..crunches the numbers……..ok, got it)
0.0% of the US Constitution is dedicated to giving Congress the authority to establish a department of education. That is therefore a power reserved for the people and the states, via ratified amendments to that Constitution.
Case study in aHe is doing what he he said he would do. I am actually surprised. You don’t see that in policitians anymore.
Few are harder on Trump than me, but I admire that.
$400M for a company with a market cap of $1 Trillion. Had Musk sucked up to Biden and endorsed Harris and EV mandates, market cap might be $2 Trillion. This is so tiny Musk probably doesn’t even know about it. To say nothing of the fact that Tesla’s technology beats the dogshit out of anyone else’s, and doing that kind of contract w Ford or GM would be a disservice to Americans.
...and also, as I pointed out above...the contract was secured under Biden.Case study in a
$400M for a company with a market cap of $1 Trillion. Had Musk sucked up to Biden and endorsed Harris and EV mandates, market cap might be $2 Trillion. This is so tiny Musk probably doesn’t even know about it. To say nothing of the fact that Tesla’s technology beats the dogshit out of anyone else’s, and doing that kind of contract w Ford or GM would be a disservice to Americans.
To try and argue Musk is better off financially under a Trump admin is an impossible task. More powerful and more famous? Yes.
Argue that Musk is an asshole or power hungry or whatever. But to say he is motivated in his DOGE role to enrich himself with government money? Doesn’t even come close to passing the smell test.
Sounds like we are actually getting something for our money. More than I can say for so many expenditures we have been made aware of. I’m sure his contracts will be scrutinized much more closely than anyone else in the country. It’s sad some can’t celebrate what this man contributes. Even sadder that the previous administration basically tried to cancel the man. Major mistake on their part.
I hope he signs an EO to increase the number of mental health treatment facilities. It’s been less than a freaking month and you lefties are absolutely losing it. Please get some help.
Simply 'hating Trump' is rapidly becoming a losing proposition.
It doesn't matter at all who the contract was secured under....and also, as I pointed out above...the contract was secured under Biden.
Details can be a bitch when a they get in the way of a narrative.
I think I could make a better argument that he’s the least conflicted. The vast majority of his wealth is Tesla which has a direct reverse correlation in valuation relative to the Trump agenda which promotes oil production, elimination of EV mandates, and China tariffs. Not to mention the guy already has Monopoly money and is much more motivated by non-financial stuff at this point. Versus pretty much anyone else that could have been appointed, who could conceivably benefit in terms of materially impacting their own net worth.It doesn't matter at all who the contract was secured under.
I didn't say that Musk was using the unprecedented executive power that he bought $280m to award his himself contracts. As I've said above, he is literally the single most conflicted person on the planet when it comes to federal spending, and yet he is also the person unilaterally making decisions regarding billions in federal spending.
Choosing to ignore this issue, which is only one of a long list of issues with DOGE, is willful ignorance. This isn't a game, and it isn't a private enterprise with far smaller stakes. These decisions are potentially impacting millions of lives and in most cases, Elon doesn't even understand the implications of his decisions, much less take the time to conduct a meaningful cost/benefit analysis.
He also admitted, during that very strange event in the Oval Office, that he lied about condoms to Gaza and can't be expected to "bat 1000" while he spreads those lies via the global communication platform that he owns and controls.
In a sane world, absolutely none of this would be considered acceptable, but at least the libs are being owned and bathrooms protected.
Y'all might want to take the time to research Elon's many public statements in the past about what he wants for the future of the country. It isn't really about reduced federal spending.
I also suggest checking out the two comments Elon's son Little X made to Trump during that presser. It's funny, but much more so telling.
EDIT: So, apparently the USAID disruption has led to $500m in food at risk of rotting on docks of Houston. The inspector general who issued that warning was fired immediately by Trump. It isn't about effectiveness or waste, it's about messaging, and the administration doesn't care who gets hurt in the process.
In a sane world, you wouldn’t be upset about cutting the government’s wasteful spending. There is nothing sane about this line of thinking. All of the conjecture is just fear and excuse making for something long overdue. I just look at it like this will. Been 20 plus days. Every single day trump has accomplished something. Or done some work for the American people. Biden was on vacation for half of his term. This is what work looks like. He has answered more questions in two weeks than Biden did in the last two years.It doesn't matter at all who the contract was secured under.
I didn't say that Musk was using the unprecedented executive power that he bought $280m to award his himself contracts. As I've said above, he is literally the single most conflicted person on the planet when it comes to federal spending, and yet he is also the person unilaterally making decisions regarding billions in federal spending.
Choosing to ignore this issue, which is only one of a long list of issues with DOGE, is willful ignorance. This isn't a game, and it isn't a private enterprise with far smaller stakes. These decisions are potentially impacting millions of lives and in most cases, Elon doesn't even understand the implications of his decisions, much less take the time to conduct a meaningful cost/benefit analysis.
He also admitted, during that very strange event in the Oval Office, that he lied about condoms to Gaza and can't be expected to "bat 1000" while he spreads those lies via the global communication platform that he owns and controls.
In a sane world, absolutely none of this would be considered acceptable, but at least the libs are being owned and bathrooms protected.
Y'all might want to take the time to research Elon's many public statements in the past about what he wants for the future of the country. It isn't really about reduced federal spending.
I also suggest checking out the two comments Elon's son Little X made to Trump during that presser. It's funny, but much more so telling.
You can make that argument, but it’s a horrible one.I think I could make a better argument that he’s the least conflicted. The vast majority of his wealth is Tesla which has a direct reverse correlation in valuation relative to the Trump agenda which promotes oil production, elimination of EV mandates, and China tariffs. Not to mention the guy already has Monopoly money and is much more motivated by non-financial stuff at this point. Versus pretty much anyone else that could have been appointed, who could conceivably benefit in terms of materially impacting their own net worth.
Rather than just broadly saying “he’s conflicted” and pointing out that some of his companies do business with the feds (hint: we all do business with the feds, but a much larger portion of our net worth is at stake in our business with the feds)……..I suggest painting a scenario in detail on how Musk can materially change his net worth via this role. And how that wouldn’t be transparent to all involved.
Will is very smart.You should probably check your sources (you're literally doing what you have criticized others for), since it doesn't exactly align with what your "posted without comment" is actually trying to emphasize:
The U.S. State Department’s procurement forecast for 2025, updated in December 2024, lists Tesla as the recipient of a $400 million contract for "Armored Tesla" vehicles. This is the largest projected contract in the forecast, spanning five years with an anticipated award date of September 30, 2025. The forecast was revised under the Biden administration, before Donald Trump took office, and is managed by the Defensive Equipment and Armored Vehicle Division. It’s unclear if this refers to modified Cybertrucks, which Tesla claims are "armored" and "bulletproof" but have limited protective capacity, or a new dedicated armored vehicle. Other armored vehicles, like BMW X5/X7 and various sedans, are also listed but with smaller budgets, ranging from $40 million to $50 million.
The contract has sparked debate due to its size and timing, especially since Elon Musk, Tesla’s CEO, is a senior government official under Trump, leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Some see it as a potential conflict of interest, though the forecast predates Trump’s administration. Critics question the necessity of $400 million in armored vehicles for the State Department and note oddities, like the contract being categorized under "All Other Miscellaneous Food Manufacturing." Supporters argue it aligns with electrification goals, potentially offering cost-effective options for embassy or VIP use. The contract’s status remains "TBD" regarding competition, leaving its finalization uncertain. You can check the details in the State Department’s FY25 Procurement Forecast spreadsheet, line 22.
At some point, your parroting of this type of crap needs a re-evaluation. You seem really smart...but, your sources are getting dumber.
Not sure about your first statement, but there is a lot of truth in everything else you said.Will is very smart.
Its just that the Dems have no plan, no strategy and no leader right now so this is all they can do.
Guess who’s lying again?Musk should do more of those. Makes everyone who is trying to keep him from even looking for government waste look really stupid. Dude is incredibly smart, and nothing he is discussing is complicated. Unlike politicians, he admits they will make mistakes, and he invites everyone to fact check and challenge any of their cuts. If they make a mistake, they will quickly correct it.
Bottom line - these aren't incompetent jackasses or greedy assholes looking for personal gain. They are simply trying to save all of us money.
My favorite line, from Musk - my goal is to cut $1T of spending and get $1T of growth (i.e. receipts)......bringing interest rates down and keeping inflation flat. "Think about how great that would be for Americans." I doubt that happens, but what if he gets $500B and $500B? You realize how that would move the needle for all of us?
But hey - let's stop these "evil billionaires!" The opposition is such an obvious case of clinging to the way government has always worked, and when looking at conflicts of interest, look no further than those in power who benefit from government spending. The worst thing for Tesla (aka Musk) financially is the Trump admin. Oil production, elimination of EV mandates, China tariffs - all terrible policy for Tesla.
He sure is finding a lot of money the Dems hid or fraudulently threw away on illegal immigration.You can make that argument, but it’s a horrible one.
I’m in the auto business. Tesla is about to get crushed by very affordable and very compelling Chinese EVs. I can’t overstate just how impressive the new wave of Chinese EVs are. The only way Tesla can compete moving forward will be massive and targeted tariffs, which he will surely get.
Space X lives or dies on federal dollars and contracts.
Regardless of either of the points above, Musk is by far the wealthiest man in this country. All of these program cuts are going to be used to help offset further tax cuts for the wealthy, which Trump has been open about and the GOP included in their just released budget.
Elon is playing the long(ish) game. Where the country’s best interest happens to align with Elon, he will make decisions that help us. But where those interests diverge, which they will quite often, don’t expect Elon’s to suddenly become a charitable figure.
Similar to corn, the shelf life of wheat is about 8-12 years.It doesn't matter at all who the contract was secured under.
I didn't say that Musk was using the unprecedented executive power that he bought $280m to award his himself contracts. As I've said above, he is literally the single most conflicted person on the planet when it comes to federal spending, and yet he is also the person unilaterally making decisions regarding billions in federal spending.
Choosing to ignore this issue, which is only one of a long list of issues with DOGE, is willful ignorance. This isn't a game, and it isn't a private enterprise with far smaller stakes. These decisions are potentially impacting millions of lives and in most cases, Elon doesn't even understand the implications of his decisions, much less take the time to conduct a meaningful cost/benefit analysis.
He also admitted, during that very strange event in the Oval Office, that he lied about condoms to Gaza and can't be expected to "bat 1000" while he spreads those lies via the global communication platform that he owns and controls.
In a sane world, absolutely none of this would be considered acceptable, but at least the libs are being owned and bathrooms protected.
Y'all might want to take the time to research Elon's many public statements in the past about what he wants for the future of the country. It isn't really about reduced federal spending.
I also suggest checking out the two comments Elon's son Little X made to Trump during that presser. It's funny, but much more so telling.
EDIT: So, apparently the USAID disruption has led to $500m in food at risk of rotting on docks of Houston. The inspector general who issued that warning was fired immediately by Trump. It isn't about effectiveness or waste, it's about messaging, and the administration doesn't care who gets hurt in the process.
Auto business,,,, helps explain a few things.You can make that argument, but it’s a horrible one.
I’m in the auto business. Tesla is about to get crushed by very affordable and very compelling Chinese EVs. I can’t overstate just how impressive the new wave of Chinese EVs are. The only way Tesla can compete moving forward will be massive and targeted tariffs, which he will surely get.
Space X lives or dies on federal dollars and contracts.
Regardless of either of the points above, Musk is by far the wealthiest man in this country. All of these program cuts are going to be used to help offset further tax cuts for the wealthy, which Trump has been open about and the GOP included in their just released budget.
Elon is playing the long(ish) game. Where the country’s best interest happens to align with Elon, he will make decisions that help us. But where those interests diverge, which they will quite often, don’t expect Elon’s to suddenly become a charitable figure.H
Geezus Cussing Cryst I wish you clowns would STOP reminding us that Elon donated $280 million towards the Trump campaign and the RNC.49.2% of the vote, a slim majority in the Senate and the slimmest majority in the House in almost one hundred years is not a mandate from the voters to completely destroy or defund major programs or departments. Elon and Trump repeating it over and over again doesn't make it true.
Oh, and Musk admitted the condoms to Gaza story was a lie, while acknowledging that his statements in the future will continue to require factchecking. How about just making more of an effort to be truthful as you personally decide which programs and spending are worthwhile and which are not?
Musk has gotten exactly what he spent $280m to get. Maybe the wealthiest man in the world, who continues to own and run three for-profit business (one of which will live or die based entirely on US government policy and dollars) and has vowed to become the world’s first trillionaire, will in fact operate as a benign benefactor, driven only by the best interests on the country as a whole. Wouldn’t that be neat.
Here is a very tangible accounting of what is only a very small subset of the benefits that Musk is getting out of his current deal. Amazing coincidences, I'm sure.Musk should do more of those. Makes everyone who is trying to keep him from even looking for government waste look really stupid. Dude is incredibly smart, and nothing he is discussing is complicated. Unlike politicians, he admits they will make mistakes, and he invites everyone to fact check and challenge any of their cuts. If they make a mistake, they will quickly correct it.
Bottom line - these aren't incompetent jackasses or greedy assholes looking for personal gain. They are simply trying to save all of us money.
My favorite line, from Musk - my goal is to cut $1T of spending and get $1T of growth (i.e. receipts)......bringing interest rates down and keeping inflation flat. "Think about how great that would be for Americans." I doubt that happens, but what if he gets $500B and $500B? You realize how that would move the needle for all of us?
But hey - let's stop these "evil billionaires!" The opposition is such an obvious case of clinging to the way government has always worked, and when looking at conflicts of interest, look no further than those in power who benefit from government spending. The worst thing for Tesla (aka Musk) financially is the Trump admin. Oil production, elimination of EV mandates, China tariffs - all terrible policy for Tesla.
Ill bet you havent asked yourself , hey why are they investigating Musks organizations? Has that occurred to anyone?Here is a very tangible accounting of what is only a very small subset of the benefits that Musk is getting out of his current deal. Amazing coincidences, I'm sure.
Maybe because he doesn't like to follow rules. It works sometimes, but not always. Remember he didn't grow up in this country.Ill bet you havent asked yourself , hey why are they investigating Musks organizations? Has that occurred to anyone?
Auto business....and works for a JAPANESE Company by his own admission.....he let that slip at some point..I keep receiptsAuto business,,,, helps explain a few things.
You anti-anything good for the country crying and whining really gets old. Chinese EV's taking over,,,, LMBO
Thenk you, good sir. There is, and never was, any mandate for the federal government to run education (or health care or retirement plans, for that matter) in the first place. Loony liberal goons in government just seized that power for themselves.
How do you know he doesn’t like to follow rules?Maybe because he doesn't like to follow rules. It works sometimes, but not always. Remember he didn't grow up in this country.
And unlike some political retribution, his problems started before he started funding the reelection.
Have you asked yourself if he funded Trump so he could get a position where he could get rid of people investigating him. He is so smart right. Just asking.
is he in the used dept?Auto business....and works for a JAPANESE Company by his own admission.....he let that slip at some point..I keep receipts