to call her a woman?
Just curious. A week ago she could not define the term.
While she might end up being a great member, the facts are as follows:
1) She was placed at the front of the line because of her skin color, not her qualifications.
2) She was placed at the front of the line because of her sex, which is actually counter to the liberal understanding of binary choice. But for the sake of the ridiculous grandstanding, the media is happy to place the “woman” label on her.
3) She has consistently been involved in political activist movements and decisions that were not based on constitutional law, but on the affirmative action doctrine. This, in a normal society, would exclude her from even being considered for a position on the Supreme Court. Judges are not to enact laws, but rather, interpet laws as they were intended, regardless of personal opinion.
4) Being a woman and being a black person should never preclude anyone from attaining the position as Supreme Court judge and it has not in the past.
5) President Biden and the Democratic Party pushed a vote buy and grandstanded.
6) Now President Biden will surely be asked why he chose her sex when a man is normally ridiculed when determining the sex of a perceived female. Where is the transgender backlash
7) When a human being openly fights for the right to kill a human life, it is evil. She can rule on the rights under current law rulings, but she has openly fought for the vulgar act of killing the unborn and promotes decision murder after birth. This, in my eyes, makes her an animal.
My opinion in the matter. Open to friendly discussion. But I will not feel obligated to cater to the media driven historical nature of this vote. It was given to her to gain political favor. Ridiculous.
My opinion on political activism and abortion would be the same for any appointee, white, black, yellow, man, female, partially female, trans Siberian male, whatever.
What makes it worse, is that no one else had a chance. Sad day for our country.
Just curious. A week ago she could not define the term.
While she might end up being a great member, the facts are as follows:
1) She was placed at the front of the line because of her skin color, not her qualifications.
2) She was placed at the front of the line because of her sex, which is actually counter to the liberal understanding of binary choice. But for the sake of the ridiculous grandstanding, the media is happy to place the “woman” label on her.
3) She has consistently been involved in political activist movements and decisions that were not based on constitutional law, but on the affirmative action doctrine. This, in a normal society, would exclude her from even being considered for a position on the Supreme Court. Judges are not to enact laws, but rather, interpet laws as they were intended, regardless of personal opinion.
4) Being a woman and being a black person should never preclude anyone from attaining the position as Supreme Court judge and it has not in the past.
5) President Biden and the Democratic Party pushed a vote buy and grandstanded.
6) Now President Biden will surely be asked why he chose her sex when a man is normally ridiculed when determining the sex of a perceived female. Where is the transgender backlash
7) When a human being openly fights for the right to kill a human life, it is evil. She can rule on the rights under current law rulings, but she has openly fought for the vulgar act of killing the unborn and promotes decision murder after birth. This, in my eyes, makes her an animal.
My opinion in the matter. Open to friendly discussion. But I will not feel obligated to cater to the media driven historical nature of this vote. It was given to her to gain political favor. Ridiculous.
My opinion on political activism and abortion would be the same for any appointee, white, black, yellow, man, female, partially female, trans Siberian male, whatever.
What makes it worse, is that no one else had a chance. Sad day for our country.
