Look at it this way Zinger, what would happen to your business if barriers were created that effectively cut off a quarter of your customers and / or suppliers? That is the net impact of shrinking markets. Tariffs make us more isolationist, thus shrinking the size of the marketplace. They are being put in place to help American manufacturing, but it is hurting American producers. Few if any US manufacturers use only American materials, meaning their costs are going up. I build apartment complexes on American soil but a sizable percentage of our materials come from overseas. Some of these materials you can’t get domestically. Builders work on 3% to 5% margins and take 100% of the risk (cost savings usually go to the owner) so we can’t just arbitrarily use more expensive American sourced items. Taking away choice doesn’t make us more efficient or better.
That's just wrong. Tariffs ARE NOT that high on the US. In fact, the average tariff in the EU on US exports is around 1%. There are Most Favored Nation tariffs on some products, but even that is 10% and the US levees 25% tariffs on pickup trucks, for example.Nearly every country we trade with charges us some degree of tarrifs. Many are massive and unfair yet that isn’t isolating them but would make us isolationists for terrifying them at 50%? Many of these countries will lower their tarrifs on us making trade better. New markets will open up where others will be prohibitive.
These tarrifs will (are) bringing in massive amounts of investment into our country which means jobs.Jobs means taking people off of welfare and making them consumers (paying taxes rather than being a burden).
Trump is also pushing tax cuts which will offset higher prices from tarrifs. Just need to push it through congress.
There will be some short term pain but that was coming no matter who was president.
It's short-term and then it will be long-term. There is no temporary.“Short term pain” is the new lingo. How exactly short term are we talking here?
Wait for the dreaded "transitory" descriptor. That's when you know it's bad...It's short-term and then it will be long-term. There is no temporary.
I think I would be more mad if this was a complete surprise. I dislike many things about Trump, but he has been literally campaigning on tariffs for over a decade.The 10 year was the best measure of how the markets liked or disliked the messaging on tariffs second by second. 100x more volume than the futures or futures etf. That was my point.
In a world where that chart that was put forth became permanent, no doubt it would pluck up a lot of shit. Ain’t gonna happen. The panic on tariffs and questioning about whether this dude in charge is really willing to do this?…..is what provides leverage in the trade deals. I agree it is pushing the envelope risk wise. We will see how it plays out.
If the economy went to shit I can promise you housing prices would not go up even if rates came crashing down.
Conversely - we may find ourselves with newly negotiated trade deals, lower rates (which = more affordable housing even if the price is higher), AND a healthy market with uncertainty eliminated. If this is a precursor to negotiation….thats a good outcome.
If he literally rolls with the chart he laid out with no negotiating flexibility……the chat libs will win the debate here. I don’t see that happening. But not wild about the risks being taken with escalation.
Yeah, tariffs are taxes. So lots of tariffs are a tax increase.
Two weeks.“Short term pain” is the new lingo. How exactly short term are we talking here?
A ford Spokesman said Ford felt it could sell an additional 5% to 7% Ford F-150's worldwide if they had open trade and reduced tariffs across Europe and Asia. They were hamstrung in most of these countries with tariffs and taxes. We are talking 50,000 trucks or $ 2 billion in potential sales. I'm fairly sure they would be happy with 25% change or so and $ 500 million more in sales.That's just wrong. Tariffs ARE NOT that high on the US. In fact, the average tariff in the EU on US exports is around 1%. There are Most Favored Nation tariffs on some products, but even that is 10% and the US levees 25% tariffs on pickup trucks, for example.
It's no shock that Trump just straight lies about tariff rates to bolster his argument for tariffs and to sell it to the sheep.
I figured you may answer the question i didn’t want to ask you. I had a good feeling this was the case. Had a similar call with a friend who may have some of his materials sky rocket as well. Which could work into his margins. Had dinner with a government employee who was all in on trump until her job may be in jeopardy. I get it. This is also a reason why I have been complaining for four years. What Biden did to my pay and my business was nothing short of criminal. I took two pay cuts and had the value of my business over long term if I ever want to sell and get out cut by 20-30 percent. If I continue to write the same amount of business over the next five years, the value wouldn’t change. So I had to change my model, get out of my comfort zone and spend much more, all while putting four kids thru college and graduate school. While also dealing with lost business due to nearly dying and being unable to work for a few months. Generally speaking trump has been much better for my industry. I don’t expect it to change. I am for once hopeful. And off the the best start to the year since I have been open. I would be a hypocrite if I didn’t listen to the other side. My very long time friend, I will hope some how things will change quickly and not affect your margins. If I know you and that brain, you will figure it out. It is happening whether we like it or not.Look at it this way Zinger, what would happen to your business if barriers were created that effectively cut off a quarter of your customers and / or suppliers? That is the net impact of shrinking markets. Tariffs make us more isolationist, thus shrinking the size of the marketplace. They are being put in place to help American manufacturing, but it is hurting American producers. Few if any US manufacturers use only American materials, meaning their costs are going up. I build apartment complexes on American soil but a sizable percentage of our materials come from overseas. Some of these materials you can’t get domestically. Builders work on 3% to 5% margins and take 100% of the risk (cost savings usually go to the owner) so we can’t just arbitrarily use more expensive American sourced items. Taking away choice doesn’t make us more efficient or better.
Look at it this way Zinger, what would happen to your business if barriers were created that effectively cut off a quarter of your customers and / or suppliers? That is the net impact of shrinking markets. Tariffs make us more isolationist, thus shrinking the size of the marketplace. They are being put in place to help American manufacturing, but it is hurting American producers. Few if any US manufacturers use only American materials, meaning their costs are going up. I build apartment complexes on American soil but a sizable percentage of our materials come from overseas. Some of these materials you can’t get domestically. Builders work on 3% to 5% margins and take 100% of the risk (cost savings usually go to the owner) so we can’t just arbitrarily use more expensive American sourced items. Taking away choice doesn’t make us more efficient or better.
Using your example, there’s already a 25% tariff on trucks imported into the US, so the market is already skewed. Wonder how many F-150s Ford would sell without that protection in the US?A ford Spokesman said Ford felt it could sell an additional 5% to 7% Ford F-150's worldwide if they had open trade and reduced tariffs across Europe and Asia. They were hamstrung in most of these countries with tariffs and taxes. We are talking 50,000 trucks or $ 2 billion in potential sales. I'm fairly sure they would be happy with 25% change or so and $ 500 million more in sales.
I have not done research on Ford F-150's but Cadalac's in Germany are taxes / tariffed at about 30% in total compared to 5% range of BMW's coming into the US. That was from a General Motors guy doing an interview several weeks ago. I'm not a trade expert but that certainly seems UNFAIR to me. Folks in my family own Cadillacs, Ford F-150's and BMW's - all good vehicles.
None of these comments came from Trump.
The numbers in those charts are completely made up. They are not tariffs that are charged by other countries. Someone else in the thread already posted a chart showing what the numbers represent. But the easiest way to know the numbers are made up is the White House's chart stated uninhabited islands have 10% tariffs on American goods. Think about that. The White House rolled a chart saying we are going to be charging tariffs on products made and exported by penguins because the penguins have a 10% tariff on American goods.
Completely made up? What channel are you watching? We are charging roughly half what those other countries are charging us.The numbers in those charts are completely made up. They are not tariffs that are charged by other countries. Someone else in the thread already posted a chart showing what the numbers represent. But the easiest way to know the numbers are made up is the White House's chart stated uninhabited islands have 10% tariffs on American goods. Think about that. The White House rolled a chart saying we are going to be charging tariffs on products made and exported by penguins because the penguins have a 10% tariff on American goods.
Beyond that, much of the rhetoric and policy is based on an idea that a trade deficit is inherently bad, and further, that the deficit is indicative of a country ripping us off. We have a trade deficit with Madagascar because we buy vanilla and nickel from them. Which we need and/or want. Guess what? Madagascar doesn't need/want much of what we can sell them, and to the extent they do need that stuff, they can't afford it. Not because of tariffs, but because they are poor. Why are we taxing American companies for importing vanilla and nickel from Madagascar because of this dynamic? It makes no sense.
If the announced tariffs stayed put, I think that's exactly what would happen. I don't think they will. This is a starting point for negotiation....an unrealistically high starting point.We could also (and more likely) see higher prices, reduced investment AND a slowing economy leading to the stagflation of the 1970s, which would be the worst own goal in the history of economics. Literally every economist is saying this is a terrible, stupid idea.
Some REITs may be flat. Hotel REITs are getting hammered. Talked to a developer this morning who has a large deposit on approximately $50k of goods for a hotel. The purchase price has now increased to over $100k.As a commercial real estate dude, I'm digging the lower rates.....but not at the expense of the economy. The REITs are about flat....when typically they pop on this kind of interest rate drop
I know. This is such a good post tiv. I forget it too when posting in these threads. It isn’t like he hasn’t been saying this for a long time. Hell I saw him give a speech back in 2011 yesterday addressing tariffing China. Despite being a big donor to Obama this is where he started to undermine him some. Started to lead to the famous torching of Trump at his presidential dinner with Trump in the audience. Point is, this is certainly not unexpectedI think I would be more mad if this was a complete surprise. I dislike many things about Trump, but he has been literally campaigning on tariffs for over a decade.
So, while the Biden administration destroyed our labor force by importing 40 million illegal aliens to do under the table labor, at least Trump is open about what his plan is and people get to vote on it. I think this is an incredibly risky move that I am not sure will pay off.
That being said, he’s doing what he said he would do. This is what the people voted for. Right or wrong.
You need to read the fact checking on those reciprocal charts. When you do, you will realize you have been fooled along with everyone else who tends to believe what Trump tells them. The whole thing is a farce.Completely made up? What channel are you watching? We are charging roughly half what those other countries are charging us.
Who is doing the fact checking? That is the problem. I have seen experts from both sides of the fence explain how it can be a disaster and how it will work. I have also seen how the negotiations could help from both sides. I have seen your opinion out there. Not saying it is wrong, but no one knows what the finished product will be. Same folks were predicting this 8 years ago. Exact same experts. You can go fact check your fact checker from 8 years ago and see if I am right. There is a list of the same experts raising hell 8 years ago who were wrong.You need to read the fact checking on those reciprocal charts. When you do, you will realize you have been fooled along with everyone else who tends to believe what Trump tells them. The whole thing is a farce.
The “tariff rates charged by foreign countries” figures in the charts DT held up are complete, total nonsense. It’s sad, but unsurprising, that he would lie about something this important. It’s equally sad that anyone would believe him.You need to read the fact checking on those reciprocal charts. When you do, you will realize you have been fooled along with everyone else who tends to believe what Trump tells them. The whole thing is a farce.
He was talking about the chart which purported to state figures representing a calculation of tariffs and non-tariff trader barriers charged on US goods. Those numbers do not represent tariffs, but instead are the product of some formula they made up based on trade deficits. The easiest way to point out they are not what the White House said they are is that the chart stated an island inhabited only by wildlife is charging the US 10% tariffs. The Council of Penguins may be unfriendly to US goods, but as far as I know they have not gone so far as to put tariffs on our goods. And we put tariffs on a territory that is only inhabited by a military base with US/UK military personnel. So we put tariffs on our own military installation. The good news is I don't think charging tariffs on the goods produced by penguins and imported to the United States will have much impact on the US or global economy.Who is doing the fact checking? That is the problem. I have seen experts from both sides of the fence explain how it can be a disaster and how it will work. I have also seen how the negotiations could help from both sides. I have seen your opinion out there. Not saying it is wrong, but no one knows what the finished product will be. Same folks were predicting this 8 years ago. Exact same experts. You can go fact check your fact checker from 8 years ago and see if I am right. There is a list of the same experts raising hell 8 years ago who were wrong.
This is obviously on a bigger scale. And it very risky from him. Not denying that, but you have 0.00 idea of how this will end. Same as me.
I get what he was getting at. More deeper responding to the “experts” fact checking. When they did the same things 8 years ago. I saw quotes put out by these folks 8 years ago. A comparison down the line. It was pretty funny to read. So many hypocrites in this country. One guy was screaming at the camera that this would be a disaster. It was quite the funny montage. No one know where this will actually end. There are ideas, but economic predictions have been pretty lousy over the past 8 years. Some of these same people were touting the economy under Biden. Which leads me to question any credibility they may have. Personally I think this is a massive game of chicken.He was talking about the chart which purported to state figures representing a calculation of tariffs and non-tariff trader barriers charged on US goods. Those numbers do not represent tariffs, but instead are the product of some formula they made up based on trade deficits. The easiest way to point out they are not what the White House said they are is that the chart stated an island inhabited only by wildlife is charging the US 10% tariffs. The Council of Penguins may be unfriendly to US goods, but as far as I know they have not gone so far as to put tariffs on our goods. And we put tariffs on a territory that is only inhabited by a military base with US/UK military personnel. So we put tariffs on our own military installation. The good news is I don't think charging tariffs on the goods produced by penguins and imported to the United States will have much impact on the US or global economy.
China has massive tariffs on us, but yet they seem to not have an issue with being considered isolationist. Their economy has grown massively by tearing us to death. Why is it that it won’t work for us? In fact, everybody has higher tariffs than us, but somehow we shouldn’t do it?You aren’t looking at it the right way. Adding tariffs make us more isolationist and they shrink the world marketplace. Think of how it would affect your business if a percentage of your customers and / or suppliers were no longer available to you. That is the net impact of tariffs.
Sorry, I feel it too.I am devastated. My job is on the line and I’ll be meeting back to back with retailers in the coming days with buyers who are scared.
We all need to re-familiarize ourselves with the concept of stagflation, because that’s where we are likely headed.The 10 years is now down to 3.88 after China retaliates with a 34% across-the-board tariff on US goods. Should be another bloodbath for stocks.
Yes, he did campaign advocating for tariffs as a part of his agenda. The other side was so bad I had to pick my poison. I agree with a lot (most) of the Trump agenda so it seemed like i was picking the better of the two options, and it may still have been the right choice, but I didn’t think he would push this aggressively and this soon for tariffs. Trump thinks he is a master-negotiator and he is a self made billionaire, but it isn’t like he has been successful in every venture. I’m used to hardball negotiating in my business, but there is a difference in playing hardball in a real estate deal than putting the entire world economy at risk.I think I would be more mad if this was a complete surprise. I dislike many things about Trump, but he has been literally campaigning on tariffs for over a decade.
So, while the Biden administration destroyed our labor force by importing 40 million illegal aliens to do under the table labor, at least Trump is open about what his plan is and people get to vote on it. I think this is an incredibly risky move that I am not sure will pay off.
That being said, he’s doing what he said he would do. This is what the people voted for. Right or wrong.
Not only aggressively implemented, but nonsensically calculated. They are lying to us about the very foundation of the program.Yes, he did campaign advocating for tariffs as a part of his agenda. The other side was so bad I had to pick my poison. I agree with a lot (most) of the Trump agenda so it seemed like i was picking the better of the two options, and it may still have been the right choice, but I didn’t think he would push this aggressively and this soon for tariffs. Trump thinks he is a master-negotiator and he is a self made billionaire, but it isn’t like he has been successful in every venture. I’m used to hardball negotiating in my business, but there is a difference in playing hardball in a real estate deal than putting the entire world economy at risk.
This aged well. What happens when the market goes way down, but treasury yields go up?A better tell than dow futures on what the market thinks of Trump tariff announcement.
If it goes way down the market real time hates what djt is saying and expect a terrible day in stock market tomorrow.
It will be easier to buy a house tho….
This administration is convinced they are so much smarter than the rest of the world, and not only are they wrong, they likely constitute the dumbest collection of senior leaders in our history, which is really saying something. Endless hubris.This aged well. What happens when the market goes way down, but treasury yields go up?
The 10-year bond action is surprising. Yield taking off tonight (approaching 4.5% as I type this). Seems the bond market expects inflation to be a bigger problem than a slowing economy (though we’ll get both if Trump stays the course). We really need something to happen that leads him to lower the new tariff rates. If he’s really willing to negotiate with other countries that provides him an out. Otherwise we’re in for a really rough ride, apparently.This administration is convinced they are so much smarter than the rest of the world, and not only are they wrong, they likely constitute the dumbest collection of senior leaders in our history, which is really saying something. Endless hubris.
I think it has more to do with China and other countries dumping US treasuries and traders piling on the momentum. A treasury dump coupled with slowing (negative) growth is the worst of both worlds.The 10-year bond action is surprising. Yield taking off tonight (approaching 4.5% as I type this). Seems the bond market expects inflation to be a bigger problem than a slowing economy (though we’ll get both if Trump stays the course). We really need something to happen that leads him to lower the new tariff rates. If he’s really willing to negotiate with other countries that provides him an out. Otherwise we’re in for a really rough ride, apparently.
I think it has more to do with China and other countries dumping US treasuries and traders piling on the momentum. A treasury dump coupled with slowing (negative) growth is the worst of both worlds.
Agreed. The disconnect between the stock and bond market is more concerning than the stock market being down in and of itself. Suggests foreign countries intentionally dumping treasuries.This administration is convinced they are so much smarter than the rest of the world, and not only are they wrong, they likely constitute the dumbest collection of senior leaders in our history, which is really saying something. Endless hubris.
The basis trade. Provides opportunity for China to pile on by dumping treasuries. The bond auctions today will be a big deal.A financial newsletter I subscribe to said this morning that this is about the 10 largest hedge funds and the highly leveraged trading of Treasuries:
"Hedge funds are way overleveraged and exposed to moves in the Treasury market via this complex trade, foreign Treasury bond holders are selling, or both.
..."a vicious unwinding of the roughly $1 trillion in hedge fund arbitrage bets would not only hamper the Treasuries market, but others as well, requiring Fed intervention to assure financial stability.
When the US central bank did that in March 2020, during the initial Covid crisis, it engaged in massive outright purchases of Treasury securities, to the tune of about $1.6 trillion over several weeks."
What is far more scary is that the average regulatory leverage, or the ratio of regulatory assets (i.e., levered exposure) to assets under management (or actual, tangible capital), has increased to a record 7.8x from 6.3x a year ago!"
I posted this many times during the Biden ministration.The 10-year bond action is surprising. Yield taking off tonight (approaching 4.5% as I type this). Seems the bond market expects inflation to be a bigger problem than a slowing economy (though we’ll get both if Trump stays the course). We really need something to happen that leads him to lower the new tariff rates. If he’s really willing to negotiate with other countries that provides him an out. Otherwise we’re in for a really rough ride, apparently.
Surrounding yourself with sycophants, who are Yasmin is exactly the kind of thing you can get away with in your tiny private real estate business. It is exactly the kind of thing you should avoid when you were president of the United States of America.
1) Stocks down so savings are getting crushed
2) Bond yields surging so America need to pay more interest on its debt
3) Dollar down so everything the US buys abroad is more expensive (on top of the tariffs)
4) Massive tariffs, which are a huge additional tax on Americans, further eating away at their spending power
5) American companies see surging costs and more difficulty doing business abroad with retaliatory measures, and boycotts
6) Cut off the Chinese market and US Agriculture in particular gets absolutely crushed and will require a massive bailout to stay solvent.
And every single bad thing that is happening right now is 100% the fault of DJT and his administration, who decided to gamble on a massive reset of every aspect of the current world order.
And unlike his last administration, if someone with a brain actually does get his ear and advises him to aggressively walk back these tariffs, Trump won’t listen because he’s convinced he’s the smartest guy in the room.
At least we will all get to enjoy Trump’s $92m military parade on his birthday. Good to see he is laser focused on the right things as we stare down an economic catastrophe.
You’re right. Treasury dumping by foreign countries (esp China) is the most likely culprit. They’re hitting us twice - raising tariffs to nearly match ours and raising the price on our sovereign debt. Bessent really has his work cut out for him.I think it has more to do with China and other countries dumping US treasuries and traders piling on the momentum. A treasury dump coupled with slowing (negative) growth is the worst of both worlds.