Who honestly thinks Kamala is capable of leading our military?

[Krowking123]

I don’t think any presidential candidate that is pro defunding the police is good for our military. Both Kamala and Trump are immature in different ways, but Trump is at least pro military and wants to get out of their way and let them take care of business. There were no complaints about how Trump handled military operations while being President as far as I remember. Kamala Harris and Biden lead the evacuation effort from Afghanistan and we saw how badly that went.

 

[Dillenger1914]

I don’t think any presidential candidate that is pro defunding the police is good for our military. Both Kamala and Trump are immature in different ways, but Trump is at least pro military and wants to get out of their way and let them take care of business. There were no complaints about how Trump handled military operations while being President as far as I remember. Kamala Harris and Biden lead the evacuation effort from Afghanistan and we saw how badly that went.

Your not serious are you? President Trump literally had a running "war" with his Generals. They hated him and he hated them. What planet have you been on?

 

[PotimusWillie]

Who honestly thinks Trump appointed judges, Republican elected politicians and appointed election officials, and voting machine companies were all in on a coordinated effort to steal the election?

But the policies ALLOWED voter fraud.

Not an organization in the world that would allow third party vote harvesting and Dropbox voting to make organizational decisions.

Human nature will corrupt a system for gain. You normally attempt to stop corruption, not create an unmanageable system.

 

[litedawg1968]

It’s a binary choice between two candidates.

Harris has been a Senator and a VP. That makes her more qualified to lead the military than Trump was in ‘16, and as qualified as any POTUS whose previous experience was limited to the state level like Bush, Regan or Carter. HW Bush was really the only person we’ve elected since Nixon who had the prior experience needed to most effectively run the military.

The performance of Trump in Atlanta last night makes it very clear that he does not have the emotional and mental makeup of a person who should be leading anything, much less the most powerful country in the world with the most powerful military ever.

People like myself saw the debate and acknowledged that Biden had no business being POTUS for the next four years. Many of us, including those (unlike myself) with an outsized voice in the process based on their financial contributions, took action and made a change.

If the GOP were a rational organization, it would be doing the same thing right now, because Trump is clearly not someone who should be anywhere near the presidency.

Well , at least youre consistent.

Oh btw , wasnt Trump already POTUS and did fine in leading the military?

If the Dems were a rational organization, they would close the border tomorrow and completely close off that line of attack from Republicans , but they dont because they are a bunch of f#cking morons.

 

[litedawg1968]

I don’t get why you are unable to understand such a simple concept.

Running for POTUS is a full time and incredibly taxing job. Being POTUS is a full time and incredibly taxing job. The current campaign is for the job of POTUS for the next four years. Biden is too old to do both jobs now and too old to be the POTUS for another four years.

Obviously you disagree that he can do the job now. That’s fine. But suggesting that stepping down as a candidate means he can’t be effective for the next seven months is a total logical fallacy.

I know you think the guy in Atalanta last night holds the high moral ground on the topic of democracy, but I don’t think the voters are going to be willing to drink the same polonium-flavored Trump tea that you and the MAGA voters continue to enjoy so much. We will find out November 5th.

Moral ground? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.

 

[WGrovedawg]

Honest question.

One that is more important in this day and time than gender rights.

Give me your thoughts.

no, she is emotionally unregulated, Dems spin her laugh as a charming or fun part of personality but if you knew someone like this you would think they were nuts


talks about guns kill then burst into laughter



talks about locking up parents for their kids truancy laughs about it



when asked why she called Biden a racist and is now his VP pick, even Colbert is stunned by her
reaction



talking about how much she loves school buses

 

[NotSilverBritches]

He was a manager of multi billion dollar businesses, so his ability to lead is without question.

Being a professional politician does not make her qualified to lead our military.

We obviously live on different planets will.

If the purpose of the Department of Defense was to turn a profit, I might see your point. Under his "unquestionable leadership," his businesses have declared bankruptcy 6 times, including twice in the casino (!) industry.

 

[ToddBburn]

If the purpose of the Department of Defense was to turn a profit, I might see your point. Under his "unquestionable leadership," his businesses have declared bankruptcy 6 times, including twice in the casino (!) industry.

That doesn’t make sense. The government doesn’t go bankrupt.
What about Kamala’s business acumen?
She just exudes leadership prowess.

 

[NotSilverBritches]

That doesn’t make sense. The government doesn’t go bankrupt.
What about Kamala’s business acumen?
She just exudes leadership prowess.

I’m not the one that pointed to his business record as reason he’s qualified to deploy a carrier strike group. I thought it was not a good reason.

I’m not saying she’s qualified either. I think you surround yourself with smart, experienced people, and make the call. Of course, just about everyone that surrounded Trump says he’s a complete moron. Including General Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

 

[ToddBburn]

I’m not the one that pointed to his business record as reason he’s qualified to deploy a carrier strike group. I thought it was not a good reason.

I’m not saying she’s qualified either. I think you surround yourself with smart, experienced people, and make the call. Of course, just about everyone that surrounded Trump says he’s a complete moron. Including General Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

You really think she will surround herself with smart people? Did you see her staff in 2020 during the election?

 

[ugaboz]

Your not serious are you? President Trump literally had a running "war" with his Generals. They hated him and he hated them. What planet have you been on?

and harris?
how about you tell us about biden and all his BS
what planet have you been on ?
nevermind we understand lol

 

[Dillenger1914]

and harris?
how about you tell us about biden and all his BS
what planet have you been on ?
nevermind we understand lol

That's a fair question and an logical one, if I was talking about Harris. I never said she was anything.

I was responding to the statement that President Trump was soooo great with the military that he had no issues, which was 100% incorrect.

Stop looking to jump into a fight, when no one is fighting. Some of you guys are worst than gang members fighting over colors.

 

[brimur]

Not how you thought this thread would go is it OP?

 

[PotimusWillie]

Not how you thought this thread would go is it OP?

How was it suppose to go?

 

[JerseyDawg]

He was a manager of multi billion dollar businesses, so his ability to lead is without question.

Being a professional politician does not make her qualified to lead our military.

We obviously live on different planets will.

Wow really. Closely held family businesses whose reported earnings have been shown to be fraudulent

 

[Lady43]

It’s a binary choice between two candidates.

Harris has been a Senator and a VP. That makes her more qualified to lead the military than Trump was in ‘16, and as qualified as any POTUS whose previous experience was limited to the state level like Bush, Regan or Carter. HW Bush was really the only person we’ve elected since Nixon who had the prior experience needed to most effectively run the military.

The performance of Trump in Atlanta last night makes it very clear that he does not have the emotional and mental makeup of a person who should be leading anything, much less the most powerful country in the world with the most powerful military ever.

People like myself saw the debate and acknowledged that Biden had no business being POTUS for the next four years. Many of us, including those (unlike myself) with an outsized voice in the process based on their financial contributions, took action and made a change.

If the GOP were a rational organization, it would be doing the same thing right now, because Trump is clearly not someone who should be anywhere near the presidency.

And woke Kamala is?

 

[PotimusWillie]

Wow really. Closely held family businesses whose reported earnings have been shown to be fraudulent

Really? Please provide financials and provide an explanation of corporate P&L’s.

You seem to be an expert, so I look forward to your response to help me decide between Trump and Harris………

 

[aadco]

Honest question.

One that is more important in this day and time than gender rights.

Give me your thoughts.

No

 

[nice marmot]

let’s focus on something more tangible. Both of Trump’s former Defense Secretaries have publicly called him unqualified and a threat to the country. Both former secretaries have expressed concerns about Trump’s decision-making and its impact on U.S. national security and military operations.

oh, but how you forget how good it felt to have Trump's steady hand on the tiller! didn't you see how he calmly reacted to the stock market's bad Monday, calmly calming the situation and offering authoritative reassurance?