Literally 10 seconds of a google search gave me a:
NEWSWEEK article "Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has warned that some Democrats who want President Joe Biden to quit the presidential race also want Vice President Kamala Harris off the party's ticket."
and a
CNN story from less than a year ago "Allies of Vice President Kamala Harris and other prominent Democrats are sending a clear message to their fellow party members who speculate that she should be replaced as President Joe Biden’s running mate in 2024: It’s time to stop it."
These aren't exactly conservative sources. There was absolutely "talk", especially as Trump was consistently ahead in the polls. Bottom line: there was enough 'buzz' on this topic to justify national-level stories (like I linked). Why? She was a weak running make & potentially was not helping Biden's ticket. That's a heck of a place to be to now being treated in some places on the Left as a Female-Obama.
It's absolute cognitive dissonance. Let's not pretend like she was previously viewed as something she isn't. She's not Trump...that's clearly enough for some people.
Which was my point. They released it when Biden was candidate, now we have to 'wait until the convention'? Pick a lane.
I never said that. I've been consistent in saying that it is VERY late in the game to have no concrete stances or anything. She managed to avoid the primary vetting. Getting any answers (especially if they differ from the admin she's currently in) with less than 90 days is foul. Is it really too much to ask to have concrete answers or at least tough interviews before early voting starts? This isn't some crazy request. She's literally had none of it nor been forced to even have a primary debate where she articulates anything.
Pretending that people don't deserve more answers this close to the election is crazy.
You obviously missed shonuff's point that they aren't going to release anything because they might be "worried" it's treated as "extreme" like the non-Trump affiliated release of Project 2025. I didn't make that point. He did.
Because she was a horrible one before? What has she done or said to make you think she's a good one? She had to drop out before Iowa, previously. What changed?
No, as I've said more than once...I think it's actually good politics, because she's so bad. But, being "good politics" doesn't make it "good" for the electorate.
I'm only criticizing a candidate that was not vetted via the normal process & clearly refuses (as a "strategy") to offer anything other than staged campaign stops & softball framing.
I only brought up Project 2025 because shonuff did. I have no interest in debating what is a complete non-issue, despite the left's desire to make it one.
...and it's unfortunate that you have to guess because we've gotten nothing from the Harris campaign letting anybody know where she stands, other than doing complete 180s on stances she's previously made clear & "stealing" Trump promises like no-tax-tips.
Please share anything of actual substance/process that even the Biden campaign provided that didn't mention Trump and we can have a discussion about that. But, I have my doubts.