It’s entirely unreasonable to expect Pelosi or anyone else to accept Jim Jordan on the committee, given he was one of the loudest amplifiers of the stolen election lie. This makes him complicit and a potential defendant regarding the matter under investigation.
Timeline: Rep. Jim Jordan, a Systematic Disinformation Campaign, and January 6
Starting in August 2020, Jim Jordan's coordinated effort to shape Trump supporters' belief in a stolen presidential election and January 6 as the "ultimate date of significance" to overturn the election.www.justsecurity.org
First, if you refer to the "big lie" in a publication without specifically rebutting the claims, your article is a joke. For example, he lied about Pelosi without stating his "lie" and being able to refute his claim with real evidence. Additionally, if Jordan did lie and lying was a disqualifying event for a committee member, how in God's name were Nadler and Schiff allowed to participate in any impeachment activity?
Next, it doesn't appear this article is accusing Jordan of any crime or doing anything numerous members of congress haven't done in the past. Do Pubs now get to kick every Dem off their committee assignments for calling an election stolen on the floor of the house?
It appears the only reason for disqualifying Jordan was he didn't buy into the dem narrative. It's okay to disagree with his assertions. It's okay to hate Trump and believe his temperament was beneath the office of POTUS. Imo, what's not okay is to silence dissenting voices, esp in the people's house. As I said in my previous post, if Jordan had made outlandish claims while on the 1/6 committee, it should have been easy to make him look foolish. Instead, the Dems chose to put on a made for TV mini series instead of inviting a legit debate.
Last edited: