I'm not going to fully engage on this, but that's an oversimplification of what happened that ignores basic logic. It's also an inherently silly argument. "Directed" his people to "go home"? That ignores what was happening that day.
I literally had no idea what happened until at least 48 hrs after...my job overseas was really busy & I was not in a time zone that allowed any real-time witness of J6.
So, I ask: Why would Trump want rioters to break into the US Capitol? He wanted Congress to debate what he said was evidence of election fraud and unconstitutional election law changes. He (as has been provided) promoted 10K additional troops...that the DC mayor nixed...why would he even leave that up to her, if he was "planning" on his "people" to storm DC? Please make it make sense.
If he had actually
planned for J6 Rioters to 'do an insurrection'...why would he even allow a Democrat DC Mayor to make the decision about 10K additional NG troops in the city? That's completely illogical....and I'm not even going to approach the mountain of weird or strange evidence that what happening in DC. There are things like the pipe bombs that are not being explored. Why? That seems like a pretty big deal that nobody has pursued when grandmothers are being sent to jail for decades for simply walking through a door. Why no pipe bomb arrests? They literally have stuff on tape.
Not saying "conspiracy"...but, that doesn't make any logical sense why TWO bombs were found and we have gotten ZERO follow-up or arrests about it.
...the video is too "dramatic" for my taste, but it makes the point: there were actual "debates" taking place. Trump's best hope was a legal/evidentiary attempt...NOT a stupid "assault" on Congress. That was literally what he was talking about prior to J6. It takes a lot of twisting of what happened that day to make it seem like he was promoting anything of that matter...yet, all his actions before & after was about using methods of legal action (whether you agree or disagree with them or not).
The point is that far too much information has been hidden/deleted/not shared publicly and given the amount of effort to jail/convict people that were wandering trespassers at worse....that doesn't sit right with me.
Why?
I'm the least-likely conspiracy person around. I'm just pointing out that a LOT was happening that day...a LOT has not been fully shared...and the J6 committee was a clearly partisan effort to 'shape' the narrative....plus, there is a ton of blatantly obvious issues that do not have sufficient answers (like the pipe bombs that really bother me...because they should be a HUGE story).