I don't necessarily - it depends - but note that Obama's bailout of Chrysler, for instance, was paid back. On the one hand, that admin got us out of a recession. On the other I don't think they went anywhere near close enough in punishing Wall Street's bad actors, and that was a mistake that might be the worst of his presidency. So, I think there are appropriate times - and ways to structure bailouts - that we have done better and worse in our history. Obviously, the current, ongoing bailout is necessary, though seemingly poorly structured (such that not enough of the money is getting to small business, and it's not really moving us forward through the crisis and has no oversight.) My major dislike is of ongoing corporate subsidies and tax breaks that both interfere with the free market AND which come at an opportunity cost of providing things that the people of this country really need, i.e. things the government is uniquely positioned to accomplish. (Is it infrastructure week yet?)