ADVERTISEMENT

Epoch Times Jan 6 film is free this week……

deadduckdawg

Pillar of the DawgVent
Gold Member
Feb 5, 2003
18,867
57,021
197
N of shithole
https://www.jan6realstory.com/part1...=Email&utm_term=Jan6P2&utm_content=2023-12-15

"The Real Story of Jan. 6," an Epoch Original Documentary by The Epoch Times, reveals the truth that has been hidden from the American people after 18 months of investigation. While a narrative has been set that what took place that day was an insurrection, key events and witnesses have been ignored, until now. With compelling interviews and exclusive video footage, the film tells the real story of Jan. 6.
 
Nice to see others taking a look at this. There is no way we should blindly accept what most in the media tell us. Their track record is that of lies and deception.
Epoch Times also publishes Covid vax studies from Europe and Asia which the MSM does not. That’s why libs rush to the pharmacy every time they’re told to get another jab. They have no idea how defective and dangerous the thing is.

Funny that they never realize how much vital information is being kept from them.
 
Epoch Times also publishes Covid vax studies from Europe and Asia which the MSM does not. That’s why libs rush to the pharmacy every time they’re told to get another jab. They have no idea how defective and dangerous the thing is.

Funny that they never realize how much vital information is being kept from them.
Liberals love their politics even if it puts them in the poorhouse or the morgue.

Gotta step away from that if you want to survive.
 
https://www.jan6realstory.com/part1...=Email&utm_term=Jan6P2&utm_content=2023-12-15

"The Real Story of Jan. 6," an Epoch Original Documentary by The Epoch Times, reveals the truth that has been hidden from the American people after 18 months of investigation. While a narrative has been set that what took place that day was an insurrection, key events and witnesses have been ignored, until now. With compelling interviews and exclusive video footage, the film tells the real story of Jan. 6.
The Epoch times directly spent millions of dollars in online advertising in support of Trump, parroted his lies about election fraud and had foreign troll farms pose as US users to amplify their content, all as part of a very well planned and successful effort to appeal to the far-right and grow their subscriber base and revenue.

None of which makes their two movies about J6 wrong, but it does suggest viewing through a very skeptical lens.

The Feds/FBI didn’t lie about the election.
They didn’t formulate a scheme around fake electors.
They didn’t call the Trump followers to DC for a rally on the day of certification.
They didn’t lie to their followers telling them that Pence could block certification.
They didn’t charge people up at a rally and send them to the Capitol to “save our country”.
They didn’t sit in the Whitehouse and watch the riots and wait three hours before telling people to go home.

SO, if there was some master plan to entrap the innocent Trump followers, a very long list of things the FBI had zero impact on had to happen before anyone even showed up at the Capitol.

Is that really what you want us to believe?
 
Last edited:
https://www.jan6realstory.com/part1...=Email&utm_term=Jan6P2&utm_content=2023-12-15

"The Real Story of Jan. 6," an Epoch Original Documentary by The Epoch Times, reveals the truth that has been hidden from the American people after 18 months of investigation. While a narrative has been set that what took place that day was an insurrection, key events and witnesses have been ignored, until now. With compelling interviews and exclusive video footage, the film tells the real story of Jan. 6.
That will be the rest of the story. Mostly true also!
 
The Epoch times directly spent millions of dollars in online advertising in support of Trump, parroted his lies about election fraud and had foreign troll farms pose as US users to amplify their content, all as part of a very well planned and successful effort to appeal to the far-right and grow their subscriber base and revenue.

None of which makes their two movies about J6 wrong, but it does suggest viewing through a very skeptical lens.

The Feds/FBI didn’t lie about the election.
They didn’t formulate a scheme around fake electors.
They didn’t call the Trump followers to DC for a rally on the day of certification.
They didn’t lie to their followers telling them that Pence could block certification.
They didn’t charge people up at a rally and send them to the Capitol to “save our country”.
They didn’t sit in the Whitehouse and watch the riots and wait three hours before telling people to go home.

SO, if there was some master plan to entrap the innocent Trump followers, a very long list of things the FBI had zero impact on had to happen before anyone even showed up at the Capitol.

Is that really what you want us to believe?
And another conspiracy theory!
 
The Epoch times directly spent millions of dollars in online advertising in support of Trump, parroted his lies about election fraud and had foreign troll farms pose as US users to amplify their content, all as part of a very well planned and successful effort to appeal to the far-right and grow their subscriber base and revenue.

None of which makes their two movies about J6 wrong, but it does suggest viewing through a very skeptical lens.

The Feds/FBI didn’t lie about the election.
They didn’t formulate a scheme around fake electors.
They didn’t call the Trump followers to DC for a rally on the day of certification.
They didn’t lie to their followers telling them that Pence could block certification.
They didn’t charge people up at a rally and send them to the Capitol to “save our country”.
They didn’t sit in the Whitehouse and watch the riots and wait three hours before telling people to go home.

SO, if there was some master plan to entrap the innocent Trump followers, a very long list of things the FBI had zero impact on had to happen before anyone even showed up at the Capitol.

Is that really what you want us to believe?
rlLmVZp.jpg
 
https://www.jan6realstory.com/part1...=Email&utm_term=Jan6P2&utm_content=2023-12-15

"The Real Story of Jan. 6," an Epoch Original Documentary by The Epoch Times, reveals the truth that has been hidden from the American people after 18 months of investigation. While a narrative has been set that what took place that day was an insurrection, key events and witnesses have been ignored, until now. With compelling interviews and exclusive video footage, the film tells the real story of Jan. 6.
Is the suggestion that Ashli Babbitt was a martyr part of the “real” story?

 
  • Sad
Reactions: mitchelldawg
Is the suggestion that Ashli Babbitt was a martyr part of the “real” story?

Are you defending this? Just curious. There were other officers there too. He could have hit anyone. He just shot into a crowd. No warning shot either. Probably has the same effect if he shot above the door the first time. Honestly think there is nothing wrong with this? 🤦‍♂️. If officers were in fear prior to folks entering the building, why didnt they shoot someone before all of this got out of hand. There were officers with guns on the other side of the door. Tactical officers appeared immediately with machine guns. The insurrection is perhaps the dumbest move in the history of the country. There is no defense. But this could have played out differently. I can see why the officer wasn’t found guilty, but this should have been handled differently. He panicked and was rewarded for it. He never even gave a warning. Just shot into a crowd.

I understand the fear the cop may have been feeling. But if this was a Democrat insurrection, they hang this cop by his toenails. He would be rotting in prison. And you know it.
 
Last edited:
Is the suggestion that Ashli Babbitt was a martyr part of the “real” story?

No, not at all, but the case is made that the killer did not have to shoot her and did not follow protocol by doing so. You do a good job of presenting the government’s and media’s case as they have fed it to you. You know, you do a lot of talking about the founding fathers and the Constitution, so you must be aware that they encouraged a healthy distrust of the government they created and even gave citizens the right to bear arms to keep the government in check. You might try a little distrust. It can’t make you feel aware to constantly parrot the government’s spin on everything. We have the NYT and WaPo for that.
 
Are you defending this? Just curious. There were other officers there too. He could have hit anyone. He just shot into a crowd. No warning shot either. Probably has the same effect if he shot above the door the first time. Honestly think there is nothing wrong with this? 🤦‍♂️. If officers were in fear prior to folks entering the building, why didnt they shoot someone before all of this got out of hand. There were officers with guns on the other side of the door. Tactical officers appeared immediately with machine guns. The insurrection is perhaps the dumbest move in the history of the country. There is no defense. But this could have played out differently. I can see why the officer wasn’t found guilty, but this should have been handled differently. He panicked and was rewarded for it. He never even gave a warning. Just shot into a crowd.

I understand the fear the cop may have been feeling. But if this was a Democrat insurrection, they hang this cop by his toenails. He would be rotting in prison. And you know it.
Amazing how two people can view the same video entirely differently.

He didn’t randomly shoot into the crowd, he shot the woman who was in the process of attempting to breach a locked doorway after several warnings and a clearly drawn firearm with instructions to stand down. She was high and he was low and if he had missed her the bullet would have gone into the ceiling.

The officer shot her because as far as he could determine, he was the last line of defense between the mob and the senators and congressmen who he was protecting and the crowd was not going to stop.

The reason the police showed so much restraint is because they had never scenario-planned for an event where the followers of a sitting president left a rally and attacked a government building. I’m sure many of the police were lifelong republicans who voted for Trump twice, and the prospect of having to use that level of force on people carrying the flag of the president was beyond comprehension. That’s a reasonable reaction given this scenario had never happened in our history.

Of course, DJT was watching this all unfold and waiting until the event was effectively over before telling his followers to leave the Capitol. If he had communicated that as soon as things turned violent, Ms Babbitt would likely still be alive.
 
Last edited:
Are you defending this? Just curious. There were other officers there too. He could have hit anyone. He just shot into a crowd. No warning shot either. Probably has the same effect if he shot above the door the first time. Honestly think there is nothing wrong with this? 🤦‍♂️. If officers were in fear prior to folks entering the building, why didnt they shoot someone before all of this got out of hand. There were officers with guns on the other side of the door. Tactical officers appeared immediately with machine guns. The insurrection is perhaps the dumbest move in the history of the country. There is no defense. But this could have played out differently. I can see why the officer wasn’t found guilty, but this should have been handled differently. He panicked and was rewarded for it. He never even gave a warning. Just shot into a crowd.
So you think it's cool to shoot unarmed women? Nice.
Maybe you can start with some of those transgender freaks.
They are probably easier targets if you need the practice.
Amazing how two people can view the same video entirely differently.

He didn’t randomly shoot into the crowd, he shot the woman who was in the process of attempting to breach a locked doorway after several warnings and a clearly drawn firearm with instructions to stand down. She was high and he was low and if he had missed her the bullet would have gone into the ceiling.

The officer shot her because as far as he could determine, he was the last line of defense between the mob and the senators and congressmen who he was protecting and the crowd was not going to stop.

The reason the police showed so much restraint is because they had never scenario-planned for an event where the followers of a sitting president left a rally and attacked a government building. I’m sure many of the police were lifelong republicans who voted for Trump twice, and the prospect of having to use that level of force on people carrying the flag of the president was beyond comprehension. That’s a reasonable reaction given this scenario had never happened in our history.

Of course, DJT was watching this all unfold and waiting until the event was effectively over before telling he followers to leave the Capitol. If he had communicated that as soon as things turned violent, Ms Babbitt would likely still be alive.
 
So you think it's cool to shoot unarmed women? Nice.
Maybe you can start with some of those transgender freaks.
They are probably easier targets if you need the practice.
He could have taken three steps toward her and whacked her on the head with his pistol. Maybe he had pepper spray. Maybe he had a baton.

Amazing how pro-gun and pro-police liberals get when an unarmed Republican woman gets shot at point blank range.
 
Last edited:
Amazing how two people can view the same video entirely differently.

He didn’t randomly shoot into the crowd, he shot the woman who was in the process of attempting to breach a locked doorway after several warnings and a clearly drawn firearm with instructions to stand down. She was high and he was low and if he had missed her the bullet would have gone into the ceiling.

The officer shot her because as far as he could determine, he was the last line of defense between the mob and the senators and congressmen who he was protecting and the crowd was not going to stop.

The reason the police showed so much restraint is because they had never scenario-planned for an event where the followers of a sitting president left a rally and attacked a government building. I’m sure many of the police were lifelong republicans who voted for Trump twice, and the prospect of having to use that level of force on people carrying the flag of the president was beyond comprehension. That’s a reasonable reaction given this scenario had never happened in our history.

Of course, DJT was watching this all unfold and waiting until the event was effectively over before telling he followers to leave the Capitol. If he had communicated that as soon as things turned violent, Ms Babbitt would likely still be alive.


Please point out the several warnings and orders to stand down.
 
Se was clearly a threat to our Republic! The US would have fallen had she not been shot point blank range through glass! (just in case you can't understand<<< That first part was sarcasm) If Washington was to be faced by an attempted coup, people would not be unarmed! Stupid argument libs!
He could have taken three steps toward her and whacked her on the head with his pistol. Maybe he had pepper spray. Maybe he had a baton.

Amazing how pro-gun and pro-police liberals get when an unarmed Republican woman gets shot at point blank range.
 
He could have taken three steps toward her and whacked her on the head with his pistol. Maybe he had pepper spray. Maybe he had a baton.

Amazing how pro-gun and pro-police liberals get when an unarmed Republican woman gets shot at point blank range.


Please point out the several warnings and orders to stand down.
There had already been significant violence against officers and again, there was not another barrier between the mob and the House chamber, which was still being evacuated.

I agree that the audio tape does not catch anything from the other side of the glass barrier due to how loud the attacking crowd was. You can clearly hear one of the rioters point out the drawn gun and multiple people testified that the officer in question issued several loud warnings.

So you think it's cool to shoot unarmed women? Nice.
Maybe you can start with some of those transgender freaks.
They are probably easier targets if you need the practice.
Babbitt made a long series of bad decisions that day, which put her in the position to make the final decision to climb the barrier and attempt to breech the hallway when faced with an officer and a drawn gun. That’s what got her killed.

Regarding your other comments, I feel bad that you inhabit such a dark world.
 
There had already been significant violence against officers and again, there was not another barrier between the mob and the House chamber, which was still being evacuated.

I agree that the audio tape does not catch anything from the other side of the glass barrier due to how loud the attacking crowd was. You can clearly hear one of the rioters point out the drawn gun and multiple people testified that the officer in question issued several loud warnings.


Babbitt made a long series of bad decisions that day, which put her in the position to make the final decision to climb the barrier and attempt to breech the hallway when faced with an officer and a drawn gun. That’s what got her killed.

Regarding your other comments, I feel bad that you inhabit such a dark world.

Here is a non-government point of view from a journalist eye witness. I know this will be hard for you.


https://youtube.com/watch?v=hSt2LJWokI0&si=fb9CArRAWA-6vgFf
 
Here is a non-government point of view from a journalist eye witness. I know this will be hard for you.


He’s not a journalist, he’s a blogger and Internet personality that has championed a number of right wing causes. He gave the game away when he admitted he was attending the rally to cover Antifa violence, and the rest of his digital footprint makes it clear he is not a neutral observer.

Nobody forced Babbitt to enter the Capitol, to proceed to that locked door or to attempt to climb the barrier and breech the doorway. The rioters were very lucky only a single person was shot.
 
He’s not a journalist, he’s a blogger and Internet personality that has championed a number of right wing causes. He gave the game away when he admitted he was attending the rally to cover Antifa violence, and the rest of his digital footprint makes it clear he is not a neutral observer.

Nobody forced Babbitt to enter the Capitol, to proceed to that locked door or to attempt to climb the barrier and breech the doorway. The rioters were very lucky only a single person was shot.
Well, then just stick to your government sources rather than exercising any semblance of open mindedness. That guy was there. Were your sources and do they have video to prove they were there? With your government-only point of view, you will never know the whole truth about Covid, the vaccines, the taxpayer money to Ukraine, Biden, and many other issues shaped by our unerring and truthful government. You also argue for science a lot, so you should realize the importance to science of healthy skepticism and doubt. But you have no such patience for the value of skepticism and doubt and questioning when it comes to government narratives parroted by MSM. Any alternative view to the government narrative is labeled conspiracy theory and sneered at.
 
There had already been significant violence against officers and again, there was not another barrier between the mob and the House chamber, which was still being evacuated.

I agree that the audio tape does not catch anything from the other side of the glass barrier due to how loud the attacking crowd was. You can clearly hear one of the rioters point out the drawn gun and multiple people testified that the officer in question issued several loud warnings.


Babbitt made a long series of bad decisions that day, which put her in the position to make the final decision to climb the barrier and attempt to breech the hallway when faced with an officer and a drawn gun. That’s what got her killed.

Regarding your other comments, I feel bad that you inhabit such a dark world.
It's you that inhabit that dark world, I will pray for you though.
So you got that going for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Athens is Heaven
https://www.jan6realstory.com/part1...=Email&utm_term=Jan6P2&utm_content=2023-12-15

"The Real Story of Jan. 6," an Epoch Original Documentary by The Epoch Times, reveals the truth that has been hidden from the American people after 18 months of investigation. While a narrative has been set that what took place that day was an insurrection, key events and witnesses have been ignored, until now. With compelling interviews and exclusive video footage, the film tells the real story of Jan. 6.
Thank you sir.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deadduckdawg
Amazing how two people can view the same video entirely differently.

He didn’t randomly shoot into the crowd, he shot the woman who was in the process of attempting to breach a locked doorway after several warnings and a clearly drawn firearm with instructions to stand down. She was high and he was low and if he had missed her the bullet would have gone into the ceiling.

The officer shot her because as far as he could determine, he was the last line of defense between the mob and the senators and congressmen who he was protecting and the crowd was not going to stop.

The reason the police showed so much restraint is because they had never scenario-planned for an event where the followers of a sitting president left a rally and attacked a government building. I’m sure many of the police were lifelong republicans who voted for Trump twice, and the prospect of having to use that level of force on people carrying the flag of the president was beyond comprehension. That’s a reasonable reaction given this scenario had never happened in our history.

Of course, DJT was watching this all unfold and waiting until the event was effectively over before telling he followers to leave the Capitol. If he had communicated that as soon as things turned violent, Ms Babbitt would likely still be alive.
You guys will defend anything. I am embarrassed by your take will. Jesus Christ. He shot an unarmed woman. No warning shot. Nothing. And that is the biggest threat he decided to shoot.

You know Trump literally walks around with proof that he told them to leave in his pocket. And he told them to be peaceful on Twitter. That were taken down. He literally had to retrieve them to prove this is bs. At this point I hate defending him. But you guys are batshit crazy if you are cool with this and at least don’t see what is wrong. He had to pull it out to answer the cnn reporters questions. For proof. Feelings for Trump aside, that is crap. Don’t see Biden having to deal with that kind of bs.gotcha crap. I wonder why


Babbit did something incredibly stupid and paid for it. That being said, this was a panicked action. We talk all the time about cops not having to kill the perpetrators. Can we not shoot to put down and not kill? There were tactical officers right there. You think no questions asked that is on you. And is a terrible look.

You guys talk about trump shooting someone in the streets and nothing happening. Biden could prison rape someone on national tv and you guys would ask for proof.
 
Last edited:
He’s not a journalist, he’s a blogger and Internet personality that has championed a number of right wing causes. He gave the game away when he admitted he was attending the rally to cover Antifa violence, and the rest of his digital footprint makes it clear he is not a neutral observer.

Nobody forced Babbitt to enter the Capitol, to proceed to that locked door or to attempt to climb the barrier and breech the doorway. The rioters were very lucky only a single person was shot.
You remember the citizens slapping rand Paul upside the head as he exited on the street. Yelling at him to say her name. I guess they should have been shot and killed as well. Quite sure that wuss was scared to death. It was an AA woman slapping him. How would that have gone over if she was shot? You know the answer. That is why your take sucks and is so hypocritical

 
Last edited:
You remember the citizens slapping Lindsay graham upside the head as he exited on the street. Yelling at him to say her name. I guess they should have been shot and killed as well. Quite sure that wuss was scared to death. It was an AA woman slapping him. How would that have gone over if she was shot? You know the answer. That is why your take sucks and is so hypocritical
Guy who killed her got promoted to captain and raised $164 K with GoFundMe.
 
The Epoch times directly spent millions of dollars in online advertising in support of Trump, parroted his lies about election fraud and had foreign troll farms pose as US users to amplify their content, all as part of a very well planned and successful effort to appeal to the far-right and grow their subscriber base and revenue.

None of which makes their two movies about J6 wrong, but it does suggest viewing through a very skeptical lens.

The Feds/FBI didn’t lie about the election.
They didn’t formulate a scheme around fake electors.
They didn’t call the Trump followers to DC for a rally on the day of certification.
They didn’t lie to their followers telling them that Pence could block certification.
They didn’t charge people up at a rally and send them to the Capitol to “save our country”.
They didn’t sit in the Whitehouse and watch the riots and wait three hours before telling people to go home.

SO, if there was some master plan to entrap the innocent Trump followers, a very long list of things the FBI had zero impact on had to happen before anyone even showed up at the Capitol.

Is that really what you want us to believe?

nice try!
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT