ADVERTISEMENT

Here's what Elon Musk is doing

Au contraire, mi amigo.

Your willingness to hand over the keys to the United States of America to an unelected unvetted foreign national with close ties to an avowed national enemy is a threat to your children.
Can you state specifically what this foreign national is going to do that is so terrible for Americans? And on what authority? Specifics please.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cherrydawg
It is absolutely unbelievable that anyone can think like that. You continue to give a mouse a cookie. He is going to want some milk too. You have to draw a line in the sand at some point. This is the fear porn now. We have a madman on the loose. 🤦‍♂️
I voted for Trump to set a madman on the loose.
 
Au contraire, mi amigo.

Your willingness to hand over the keys to the United States of America to an unelected unvetted foreign national with close ties to an avowed national enemy is a threat to your children.
America has long been run by unelecteds living in a decadent, isolated imperial city. The culture of DC is foreign to most of America.

For the first time, political power is not working in their favor. A golden age, indeed.
 
Can you state specifically what this foreign national is going to do that is so terrible for Americans? And on what authority? Specifics please.
Take it from the famous podcaster, essayist, vaccine denier, and attorney Tom Renz:

“I like what DOGE is doing but am not convinced it’s legal and hate the precedent. What happens when we have the next Democrat presidency and they invite George Soros and Bill Gates in to do what DOGE is doing? Why aren’t conservatives concerned about the precedent? What’s the plan to keep this from being misused in the future?”
 
Take it from the famous podcaster, essayist, vaccine denier, and attorney Tom Renz:

“I like what DOGE is doing but am not convinced it’s legal and hate the precedent. What happens when we have the next Democrat presidency and they invite George Soros and Bill Gates in to do what DOGE is doing? Why aren’t conservatives concerned about the precedent? What’s the plan to keep this from being misused in the future?”

DOGE doesn't work the other way, because DOGE is about negative action - cuts and elimination. The inverse of DOGE is more spending, more agencies, sub agencies, government-funded NGOs, etc.

The progressive version of DOGE is essentially the status quo of Washington for a century.
 
You got that right!
If the unions for federal workers are suing him to prevent his access to how they are paid, he is on the right track. I am trying to see where you are coming from here. I know it is based on no trust of Trump foremost and now Elon. Lawsuits were always going to happen no matter who we picked to do the oversight. Or retool. Maybe it will set a precedent for politicians not to beleive they can get so many ridiculous grants or monies approved for things. Some of the stuff on the list is ridiculous. That is now been brought into the light. You act like Elon is a terrorist calling him a foreign national. It is absolutely a ridiculous statement. He has voted for Obama twice. Joe and Hillary once. Now Trump. But you classify him as a foreign national. Do you even smell any hypocrisy when you type this stuff out? Your concerns are duly noted. I even understand them. But the benefits far outweigh how we get the results at this point. And this was part of trump’s platform. He won the election. The overwhelming majority wants this to happen.

I do get people worrying about the precedent this sets. But I don’t know how the left will send someone in to make something more efficient and get away with adding back these ridiculous programs. The left could try this when they are back in. But if they are eliminating wasteful spending with right leaning agendas, I will be all for it.
 
Take it from the famous podcaster, essayist, vaccine denier, and attorney Tom Renz:

“I like what DOGE is doing but am not convinced it’s legal and hate the precedent. What happens when we have the next Democrat presidency and they invite George Soros and Bill Gates in to do what DOGE is doing? Why aren’t conservatives concerned about the precedent? What’s the plan to keep this from being misused in the future?”
Super vague. What specifically should we be afraid of? What service or payment should we as Americans expect to no longer receive due to the "dangerous precedent" of independently asking what taxpayer funds are being used for?
 
If the unions for federal workers are suing him to prevent his access to how they are paid, he is on the right track. I am trying to see where you are coming from here. I know it is based on no trust of Trump foremost and now Elon. Lawsuits were always going to happen no matter who we picked to do the oversight. Or retool. Maybe it will set a precedent for politicians not to beleive they can get so many ridiculous grants or monies approved for things. Some of the stuff on the list is ridiculous. That is now been brought into the light. You act like Elon is a terrorist calling him a foreign national. It is absolutely a ridiculous statement. He has voted for Obama twice. Joe and Hillary once. Now Trump. But you classify him as a foreign national. Do you even smell any hypocrisy when you type this stuff out? Your concerns are duly noted. I even understand them. But the benefits far outweigh how we get the results at this point. And this was part of trump’s platform. He won the election. The overwhelming majority wants this to happen.

I do get people worrying about the precedent this sets. But I don’t know how the left will send someone in to make something more efficient and get away with adding back these ridiculous programs. The left could try this when they are back in. But if they are eliminating wasteful spending with right leaning agendas, I will be all for it.
Bottom line is that the only thing keeping the funding in place for a program that 70% of common sense Americans would not support is secrecy. All this effort is doing is attempting to eliminate that secrecy, and it is scaring the shit out of the left for some reason.

Rest assured that if Trump and / or Musk attempt to eliminate something that a majority of common sense Americans support, it will not happen. Why? It does neither Trump nor Musk any good to do that.

Why is there such an effort to keep US taxpayer uses of funds in the dark?
 
Take it from the famous podcaster, essayist, vaccine denier, and attorney Tom Renz:

“I like what DOGE is doing but am not convinced it’s legal and hate the precedent. What happens when we have the next Democrat presidency and they invite George Soros and Bill Gates in to do what DOGE is doing? Why aren’t conservatives concerned about the precedent? What’s the plan to keep this from being misused in the future?”
If they invite Soros and Gates to cut government waste? The more the merrier, but we know that won’t happen.
 
  • Love
Reactions: cherrydawg
Au contraire, mi amigo.

Your willingness to hand over the keys to the United States of America to an unelected unvetted foreign national with close ties to an avowed national enemy is a threat to your children.
Maybe because the unelected bureaucrats have demonstrated close ties with avowed national enemies and made us dependent on them for everything from meds, to national security necessities. Musk, like every other CEO of large corps is waist deep in China because those which you seem determined to protect made it almost impossible to survive without doing business with China. If it's a choice of Musk might be corrupt but is exposing the corruption of the entrenched bureaucracy vs allowing the bureaucracy to continue operating in the dark, I'm choosing Musk 100 out of 100 times.
 
Last edited:
Super vague. What specifically should we be afraid of? What service or payment should we as Americans expect to no longer receive due to the "dangerous precedent" of independently asking what taxpayer funds are being used for?
The problem is a lot of good, well-intentioned people on the "right" have been psy-oped for years that it is dangerous to govern effectively for their causes, because the left might do the same thing. Very intelligent people can find all sorts of constitutional arguments to avoid using power.

Of course, the left doesn't care about any of this and attempts to do anything they can get away with.

This is why the Republican Party has, for the most part, been the Washington Generals of American politics (the one exception being the Bush years where Republicans didn't care about limits and were very successful at growing the very government they ran against for decades.)
 
The problem is a lot of good, well-intentioned people on the "right" have been psy-oped for years that it is dangerous to govern effectively for their causes, because the left might do the same thing. Very intelligent people can find all sorts of constitutional arguments to avoid using power.

Of course, the left doesn't care about any of this and attempts to do anything they can get away with.

This is why the Republican Party has, for the most part, been the Washington Generals of American politics (the one exception being the Bush years where Republicans didn't care about limits and were very successful at growing the very government they ran against for decades.)
In the area of trying to cut out wasteful spending, I think we can rest assured that whatever precedent Trump / Musk set will not be weaponized when the democrats are in power. By definition, getting aggressive in this area runs completely counter to the purpose of the democratic party.
 
Super vague. What specifically should we be afraid of? What service or payment should we as Americans expect to no longer receive due to the "dangerous precedent" of independently asking what taxpayer funds are being used for?
I just called the bank that holds my mortgage--needed some information from them, and to reset my online password. They asked for my loan #, the last four of my ss#, my property address, my full name as it appears on my loan document. This was information I was happy to give them, because several years ago I chose this bank as my mortgage provider and I believe the people at this bank will protect my valuable personal information.

I do NOT give Elon Musk or anyone he would designate that same permission to access my personal information. Elon has not been elected, he has not been vetted, he has absolutely no business knowing my social security number or any other personal ID information of mine.

Let's say that the organization I was calling just now was the Small Business Administration (as as a multi-decade small business owner, I took out SBA-guaranteed loans at least twice). Elon Musk would already have all my personal info and could use it however he pleases. How would he use my info?--why would he want to use my info? It doesn't matter, I would've never given him permission to use it, he has no right to it, and he's already broken the law by accessing it.

I'm not really "afraid of" Elon, but as a US citizen I am concerned about him and extremely pissed off about what he's doing.
 
From Heather Cox Richardson:

I’m going to start tonight by stating the obvious: the Republicans control both chambers of Congress: the House of Representatives and the Senate. They also control the White House and the Supreme Court. If they wanted to get rid of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), for example, they could introduce a bill, debate it, pass it, and send it on to President Trump for his signature. And there would be very little the Democrats could do to stop that change.

But they are not doing that.

Instead, they are permitting unelected billionaire Elon Musk, whose investment of $290 million in Trump and other Republican candidates in the 2024 election apparently has bought him freedom to run the government, to override Congress and enact whatever his own policies are by rooting around in government agencies and cancelling those programs that he, personally, dislikes.

The replacement of our constitutional system of government with the whims of an unelected private citizen is a coup. The U.S. president has no authority to cut programs created and funded by Congress, and a private citizen tapped by a president has even less standing to try anything so radical.
Dude, USAID was created by EO by Kennedy ain’t no congress in it. And your info is all over the dark web.
 
Unbelievable.

Trumpees either don't care that a rogue agent has hacked their government's records, or they think it's OK because the agent is the richest man in the world, and they all worship and adore rich guys.

At best, doge is gonna get the US involved in countless costly and time-consuming lawsuits. At worst, American citizens are going to be stomped on by Elon and his bunch of computer nerds.

You're not gonna like it when the dogers turn against you, and sooner or later they will.
It really shows in your posts you don't like losing. Unbelievable that it took losing for you to get mad at government. The rest of the chat knows the last 4 years nearly destroyed the country. Most of what they are trying to do in reforming government only has an upside -because not doing anything guarantees we are doomed. Better to go down with a fight.
 
The problem is a lot of good, well-intentioned people on the "right" have been psy-oped for years that it is dangerous to govern effectively for their causes, because the left might do the same thing. Very intelligent people can find all sorts of constitutional arguments to avoid using power.

Of course, the left doesn't care about any of this and attempts to do anything they can get away with.

This is why the Republican Party has, for the most part, been the Washington Generals of American politics (the one exception being the Bush years where Republicans didn't care about limits and were very successful at growing the very government they ran against for decades.)
One of my favorite metaphors that I have used on this board myself many times!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Georgia Knight
I just called the bank that holds my mortgage--needed some information from them, and to reset my online password. They asked for my loan #, the last four of my ss#, my property address, my full name as it appears on my loan document. This was information I was happy to give them, because several years ago I chose this bank as my mortgage provider and I believe the people at this bank will protect my valuable personal information.

I do NOT give Elon Musk or anyone he would designate that same permission to access my personal information. Elon has not been elected, he has not been vetted, he has absolutely no business knowing my social security number or any other personal ID information of mine.

Let's say that the organization I was calling just now was the Small Business Administration (as as a multi-decade small business owner, I took out SBA-guaranteed loans at least twice). Elon Musk would already have all my personal info and could use it however he pleases. How would he use my info?--why would he want to use my info? It doesn't matter, I would've never given him permission to use it, he has no right to it, and he's already broken the law by accessing it.

I'm not really "afraid of" Elon, but as a US citizen I am concerned about him and extremely pissed off about what he's doing.
Time to bring out the doll and show us where he touched you. Unbelievable the hatred for him this has created in you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cherrydawg
I just called the bank that holds my mortgage--needed some information from them, and to reset my online password. They asked for my loan #, the last four of my ss#, my property address, my full name as it appears on my loan document. This was information I was happy to give them, because several years ago I chose this bank as my mortgage provider and I believe the people at this bank will protect my valuable personal information.

I do NOT give Elon Musk or anyone he would designate that same permission to access my personal information. Elon has not been elected, he has not been vetted, he has absolutely no business knowing my social security number or any other personal ID information of mine.

Let's say that the organization I was calling just now was the Small Business Administration (as as a multi-decade small business owner, I took out SBA-guaranteed loans at least twice). Elon Musk would already have all my personal info and could use it however he pleases. How would he use my info?--why would he want to use my info? It doesn't matter, I would've never given him permission to use it, he has no right to it, and he's already broken the law by accessing it.

I'm not really "afraid of" Elon, but as a US citizen I am concerned about him and extremely pissed off about what he's doing.
The bureaucrat at SBA wasn't elected and has access to your private info.
 
One of my favorite metaphors that I have used on this board myself many times!
Denzel Washington GIF
 
I just called the bank that holds my mortgage--needed some information from them, and to reset my online password. They asked for my loan #, the last four of my ss#, my property address, my full name as it appears on my loan document. This was information I was happy to give them, because several years ago I chose this bank as my mortgage provider and I believe the people at this bank will protect my valuable personal information.

I do NOT give Elon Musk or anyone he would designate that same permission to access my personal information. Elon has not been elected, he has not been vetted, he has absolutely no business knowing my social security number or any other personal ID information of mine.

Let's say that the organization I was calling just now was the Small Business Administration (as as a multi-decade small business owner, I took out SBA-guaranteed loans at least twice). Elon Musk would already have all my personal info and could use it however he pleases. How would he use my info?--why would he want to use my info? It doesn't matter, I would've never given him permission to use it, he has no right to it, and he's already broken the law by accessing it.

I'm not really "afraid of" Elon, but as a US citizen I am concerned about him and extremely pissed off about what he's doing.
Does Elon Musk have a high security clearance?


The fears have been compounded because Mr. Musk has a top secret security clearance at SpaceX, which makes him privy to classified material such as advanced U.S. military technology.Dec 17, 2024
 
The bureaucrat at SBA wasn't elected and has access to your private info.
Yeah but unlike Musk that guy isn’t gonna use that info to wire himself thousands of dollars. That’s the risk here - that the richest man on the planet, because he wasn’t elected, will steal thousands of dollars from individual American taxpayers. And it is for this reason we can’t allow him to see what the US federal government is spending money on.
 
I just called the bank that holds my mortgage--needed some information from them, and to reset my online password. They asked for my loan #, the last four of my ss#, my property address, my full name as it appears on my loan document. This was information I was happy to give them, because several years ago I chose this bank as my mortgage provider and I believe the people at this bank will protect my valuable personal information.

I do NOT give Elon Musk or anyone he would designate that same permission to access my personal information. Elon has not been elected, he has not been vetted, he has absolutely no business knowing my social security number or any other personal ID information of mine.

Let's say that the organization I was calling just now was the Small Business Administration (as as a multi-decade small business owner, I took out SBA-guaranteed loans at least twice). Elon Musk would already have all my personal info and could use it however he pleases. How would he use my info?--why would he want to use my info? It doesn't matter, I would've never given him permission to use it, he has no right to it, and he's already broken the law by accessing it.

I'm not really "afraid of" Elon, but as a US citizen I am concerned about him and extremely pissed off about what he's doing.
Hysterics of a leftist snowflake
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT