Derek Chauvin had two official reprimands, one for shooting a latino suspect in the back and one for kneeling on the neck of a black woman during a domestic violence call.
Beyond that, you are being incredibly obtuse. The video caused the riots. The same video that captured three officers doing nothing while one officer knelt on the neck of a defenseless black man for eight minutes while he looked directly into the camera recording the situation several times. The same video that captured civilians begging Chauvin to get off his neck because the officer was killing Floyd. No video, no riots.
Did people draw their own conclusions regarding what happened? Of course, everyone was able to watch the entire episode and draw their own conclusions. Or I guess you are suggesting that people should have waiting for the result of a detailed investigation? Kind of like the people on this and other threads on the Chat decided to wait for the result of a weeks-long investigation before making accusations about the Trump shooting?
I'm confident that if you or I were black, and either of us had a bad personal experience with the police or knew people who had, you would absolutely draw conclusions from that video. That's human nature and, once again, no video, no riot.
Speaking of changing the subject yet again, now you want to talk the documents case. Cannon dismissed the case because she has decided that the prior rulings of every court related to whether the appointment of a special prosecutor is constitutional or not are inconvenient for her agenda, so irrelevant. That literally has nothing to do with anything Jack Smith did or didn't do beyond agreeing to the appointment. It also says nothing about Trump's guilt or innocence. It also means that Hunter Biden walks, as his special prosecutor is also supposedly unconstitutional. If you attribute that to Jack Smith, you should refrain from commenting on the matter.
Find me a reputable legal commentator (one who isn't on the Fox payroll) who defends the Cannon decision, and I will gladly read what he or she has to say.
Still waiting to hear what I lied about.
Did you peak in high school? You sound like someone who peaked in high school.
The African American police chief and captain said nothing racial about those complaints. You as usual forgot to include that in another spin. We can agree chauvin is a piece of crap. Here is the truth if you want to read it. 18 complaints actually filed against him. Not two. Only one was allowed to be mentioned in court. Again. You can’t get one thing right. Not one. 😂Derek Chauvin had two official reprimands, one for shooting a latino suspect in the back and one for kneeling on the neck of a black woman during a domestic violence call.
Beyond that, you are being incredibly obtuse. The video caused the riots. The same video that captured three officers doing nothing while one officer knelt on the neck of a defenseless black man for eight minutes while he looked directly into the camera recording the situation several times. The same video that captured civilians begging Chauvin to get off his neck because the officer was killing Floyd. No video, no riots.
Did people draw their own conclusions regarding what happened? Of course, everyone was able to watch the entire episode and draw their own conclusions. Or I guess you are suggesting that people should have waiting for the result of a detailed investigation? Kind of like the people on this and other threads on the Chat decided to wait for the result of a weeks-long investigation before making accusations about the Trump shooting?
I'm confident that if you or I were black, and either of us had a bad personal experience with the police or knew people who had, you would absolutely draw conclusions from that video. That's human nature and, once again, no video, no riot.
Speaking of changing the subject yet again, now you want to talk the documents case. Cannon dismissed the case because she has decided that the prior rulings of every court related to whether the appointment of a special prosecutor is constitutional or not are inconvenient for her agenda, so irrelevant. That literally has nothing to do with anything Jack Smith did or didn't do beyond agreeing to the appointment. It also says nothing about Trump's guilt or innocence. It also means that Hunter Biden walks, as his special prosecutor is also supposedly unconstitutional. If you attribute that to Jack Smith, you should refrain from commenting on the matter.
Find me a reputable legal commentator (one who isn't on the Fox payroll) who defends the Cannon decision, and I will gladly read what he or she has to say.
Still waiting to hear what I lied about.
Did you peak in high school? You sound like someone who peaked in high school.
![www.usatoday.com](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.usatoday.com%2Fgcdn%2Fpresto%2F2021%2F03%2F30%2FUSAT%2Fdcc14212-90c4-4923-8864-2911a26ec86a-AP21089543133422.jpg%3Fcrop%3D2971%2C1671%2Cx0%2Cy0%26width%3D2971%26height%3D1671%26format%3Dpjpg%26auto%3Dwebp&hash=9c4678f8a55d77debac944bfeda1511c&return_error=1)
Derek Chauvin used force against suspects before George Floyd. The jury won't hear about 6 of those incidents.
Prosecutors tried to introduce six incidents in which they say Derek Chauvin used unreasonable force on people. The judge didn't allow them.
www.usatoday.com
Opposing views here and agreements with the Jack smith ruling. And a history of his failures. Since you said you can’t find one person defending her. I will help you out with that.
Why Jack Smith Appointment Was Unconstitutional: Andy McCarthy | National Review
www.nationalreview.com
Judge tosses Trump classified documents case, rules prosecutor appointment unconstitutional
Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the criminal case against former President Donald Trump over his handling of classified documents.
www.usatoday.com
![theconversation.com](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.theconversation.com%2Ffiles%2F607032%2Foriginal%2Ffile-20240715-17-zvzc7m.jpg%3Fixlib%3Drb-4.1.0%26rect%3D40%252C107%252C2955%252C1477%26q%3D45%26auto%3Dformat%26w%3D1356%26h%3D668%26fit%3Dcrop&hash=830c0a5cdfd7596ad6af963b5c563639&return_error=1)
Trump-appointed federal judge rules Trump’s classified document case is unconstitutional – here’s how special counsels have been authorized before
In 1988, the US Supreme Court ruled that independent counsels were constitutional.
![theconversation.com](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.theconversation.com%2Fstatic%2Ftc%2F%40theconversation%2Fui%2Fdist%2Fesm%2Flogos%2Fweb-app-logo-192x192-2d05bdd6de6328146de80245d4685946.png&hash=e50832e5b61c776f25f4ad0997a0a133&return_error=1)
Loading…
www.nytimes.com
Damn
If I did peak in hs, I could count on you to spin that too. I am sure you would have had a good view from the bleachers.
Last edited: