since you brought it up. Grab em where? @nice marmot
Seems like Joe’s motto is just walk up and grab their titties. I am famous.
Time to Head to the Appeals Court
- Thread starter celticdawg
- Start date
since you brought it up. Grab em where? @nice marmot
Seems like Joe’s motto is just walk up and grab their titties. I am famous.
For politicians. Not companies. Or taking food or money away from folks. And certainly not this often.
Oh, now we have an issue with inappropriate touching? That seems problematic for a Trump voter, but ok.
since you brought it up. Grab em where? @nice marmot
Seems like Joe’s motto is just walk up and grab their titties. I am famous.
Connect these dots. She had no idea when it happened. No idea if they even had actual sex. She said rape is hot. And she has named her cat vagina. Strong witness. Glad I am married and not out there
Trump lost the case primarily because of corroborating testimony from others (both about Carroll’s experience and similar personal treatment by Trump) and his own deposition.
He confirmed he meant what he said in the pu**grab tape and then confused the woman who “wasn’t his type” with his second wife. That’s going to lose you a civil trial every time.
He lost the case for reasons we all know. He wouldn’t stop running his mouth. He has made so many enemies. I am sure they found some people to corroborate it. The woman is not all there. Who says rape is hot. After being raped. Only someone who wasn’t.
Please connect the dots on eva and the little girl for me. That didn’t happen in 1996. And there is proof on camera. Smh. You don’t need circumstantial proof.
Last edited:
Biden’s biggest gaffes: Muddling up wars, forgetting names and dozing off mid-event
Democrat has a well-documented history of embarrassing blunders
www.independent.co.uk
I hope he keeps posting them ….the difference between the two is so glaring that it just reaffirms the point ….Still waiting for the State of The Union Address…that’s going to be pure comedy and about 6weeks past it’s traditional time ..I bet the Dems try to find a way to cancel the address
We will see if he can still read. He can’t help himself. He will always think he is still good ole uncle Joe and go off script. He will likely give up state’s secrets to the world.
The exact same things were said before last year’s State of the Union and, despite the Sedition Caucus yelling and interrupting Joe like the unruly children that they are, Joe more than held his own.
Kind of similar to the three years of promises that Joe was going to destroy the economy.
In the mean time, Trump’s deep need for narcissistic supply puts him in front of the camera daily, where he proceeds to make a multitude of mistakes, every time. As the legal pressure continues to ramp, it’s going to get worse.
Find me a case anywhere in the US where a business was sued by the federal government for hundreds of millions for transactions that were successful all around. With zero damages to anyone. Find me one for ten million. Ever. Then we can talk about your interpretation of the law. An interpretation that has never been applied in this way. Ever. This is wrong.
I think we can all agree that neither are fit to serve.
Biden is to old and will never survive a second term.
I think most people thought he would be a return to normal for one term and a buffer after Trump and the US returning to its senses and nominating the next generation of politicians. Biden, like most politicians is power hungry and does not want to give that power up, so we are stuck with him being one of the choices.
Trump is not fit to serve for entirely different reasons.
Yes he is old and makes gaffs, but comes across as more vibrant than Biden.
The fact that someone has 92 indictments, tried to steal an election, convicted of sexual assault is STILL is the number one choice when there were other (and better) qualified, very conservative candidates, tells me the base is cult like. Not so long ago someone in that much legal trouble and morally bankrupt, would have booed off the stage.
So here we are.
I will be 62 years old this year. I could not even imagine a story like this happening in our great country.
No matter who wins, America loses.
Biden is to old and will never survive a second term.
I think most people thought he would be a return to normal for one term and a buffer after Trump and the US returning to its senses and nominating the next generation of politicians. Biden, like most politicians is power hungry and does not want to give that power up, so we are stuck with him being one of the choices.
Trump is not fit to serve for entirely different reasons.
Yes he is old and makes gaffs, but comes across as more vibrant than Biden.
The fact that someone has 92 indictments, tried to steal an election, convicted of sexual assault is STILL is the number one choice when there were other (and better) qualified, very conservative candidates, tells me the base is cult like. Not so long ago someone in that much legal trouble and morally bankrupt, would have booed off the stage.
So here we are.
I will be 62 years old this year. I could not even imagine a story like this happening in our great country.
No matter who wins, America loses.
Last edited:
Not $1 of investor funds were lost and Merrill Lynch paid a $415m fine.
It will end when the left has us totally trapped under their rule and we have no recourse but be good little sheep, just like current dem supporters. The left will destroy what is left of the constitution and tell us all how we must live, who we must worship, who we must love/ hate, etc. If we allow this to happen, it will be our own fault. The previews have been there for the last 30 years or so.
Oh yea. Joe did great. Did you even read your post. You said he held his own. No he didn’t. He got thru it. Will you are totally brainwashed here. Is that what you want for your president. Hold his own and get thru it. That was three years ago. He is way worse now. They don’t let him answer questions. When they do it is a disaster. When he has to go over seas, he falls asleep, gets names wrong, ask for dead people to stand up for applause, etc. I will admit he did better in the debates last time than I ever imagined. But he is way gone now. Last week wasn’t just a disaster, it pulled our pants down in front of the world. Signaled to everyone we are weak and are vulnerable. I can admit trumps flaws. I don’t want to vote for him. But the very basic quality a leader has to have is strength and his mind. Biden has neither. He can’t even pretend these days. He will likely have to be admitted to a home during the next four years. You vote for the president. Not the vp.
He was mad about not remembering his son’s date of death. Totally blanked on stage with that.
Apples and oranges. The government sued a private business for issues having nothing to do wirh elected office or the presidency. And is trying to take a ridiculous sum.
Co-mingling outside funds is a huge no-no. Especially for a gigantic money manger line Merrill. And in no way has any relevance to this. Furthermore, this is not a “predetermined fine”. They are literally putting their thumb in the air and calculating “damages” as profits made on good loans that he “didn’t deserve”. Laughable. Literally ridiculous.Not $1 of investor funds were lost and Merrill Lynch paid a $415m fine.
You are moving the goal posts.
“Find me a case anywhere in the US where a business was sued by the federal government for hundreds of millions for transactions that were successful all around. With zero damages to anyone. Find me one for ten million”.
My example meets every criteria you demanded, and then some. No commingled funds were lost, the risky trades worked, the fine was hundreds of millions and this case is not unique.
Biden trapped the GOP in real time on the topic of social security as MTG and the other circus monkeys were trying to rattle him by yelling and interrupting. That’s a little better than “got through it.”
Biden is old as dirt and can definitly be forgetful and misspeak (which he has done his entire career.)
The point is that the gap between the two candidates is nothing like what you keep insisting it is.
That joke of a ruling will never hold up. The two tiered justice system is a precursor of the reckoning that is coming if the Democrats keep pushing their agenda.
No he is hiding in a basement or sitting on a beach in Delaware. SMH. You are sooooo hypocrsitical.
The real fact is the gap between the two is nothing like YOU and other die hard libs keep insisting. MUCH LARGER than you will admit.
Here is a link to pages of youtube videos of your main man. There are just too many to post.
and even the hand selected special investigator to cover for his crimes brought up how he is nothing but a senile forgetful old man. But you libs just keep whistling in the wind.
and even the hand selected special investigator to cover for his crimes brought up how he is nothing but a senile forgetful old man. But you libs just keep whistling in the wind.
Ok I failed to add arbitrary and capricious as a criteria in the goalpost. It goes without saying. Had Trump taken bank money and instead of using it to buy property as disclosed he bet on blackjack and won, and then paid back the loan, it would be apples to apples - and he should go to jail.
Ridiculous. I would encourage you to find the opinions of successful business people on the left about this ruling. It is total bullshit. If you would agree to this obvious fact you would have a lot more credibility in arguing other issues.
New York governor seeks to quell business owners’ fears after Trump ruling | Donald Trump | The Guardian
Kathy Hochul says law-abiding businesspeople have ‘nothing to worry about’ after question on state’s commercial climate
She is obviously hearing it from everyone. People can smell bs politics a mile away. She basically walks right into it in this interview. Calling it an extremely rare circumstance. Of course it is. Never been done before.
I got my popcorn ready ..they wil have him so full of drugs and my prediction is you will not see him for about a week beforehand..trying desperately to prepare him to see if he’s able to read the teleprompter. It’s pretty bad when you judge your President‘s success on being able to read a message on a teleprompter clearly or that's even halfway understandable, instead of delivering one with clear and precise thoughts. A message with achievements, and views instead of the same ole bullshi+..scare tactics. Using the same old talking points about “fighting for our democracy” and “MAGA Extremist” over and over..as he squints and says “Cmon Man” what a joke!..And by the way, he has destoyed the economy…ask everyday Americans trying to paybills and buy groceries, or someone trying to buy their first home! Hilarious for you to even state that or even try to defend that fact
Last edited:
lol. What was that about being able to read the teleprompter? Here’s Trump flubbing the same line at two different events.
LOL..Please keep posting them, you are just proving my point..the difference in the two is so obvious and glaring. AND YOU KEEP POSTING THE SAME FEW ONES YOU HAVE SAVED…LOL…mine will be day after day after day of different gaffes….the continued incompetence that is Joe Biden
Will he be hiding in his basement today after another long weekend away from Washington? He has yet to take or answer the questions after his last train wreck statement he made last week..after not taking questions (AGAIN), but promising he would answer questions “in a day or two”…Where are you Joe?
Last edited:
People see what they want to see and arguing with a Trump supporter on any topic related to his character or competence is a waste of time.
You and I aren’t the people who will determine the next election and I think Trump’s public performances won’t support the idea that he is the more mentally competent of the two. But we will see.
Just as arguing with a Biden supporter on Biden’s imcompetence, character, unwillingness to follow and enforce immigration laws, weaponizing and politicizing the judiciary system, and false “business” dealings between himself, his son and our foreign adversaries is a total waste of time
If you want to try and call it that.
I don’t recall the Democratic Fund Raising chest pic posting 74 yr old judge bringing that case up in his attempts to show precedence…Is this just you trying to relate a case? If so, even Democratic legal experts disagree with you. There is a HUGE difference in past cases.
From the liberal left leaning Assoc Press
”ITS THE ONLY BIG BUSINESS FOUND THAT WAS THREATENED WITH A SHUTDOWN WITHOUT A SHOWING OF OBVIOUS VICTIMS AND MAJOR LOSSES”
Dissolving Trump's business empire would stand apart in history of NY fraud law
AP’s review of nearly 150 cases since New York’s “repeated fraud” statute was passed showed that nearly every previous time a company was taken away, victims and losses were key factors.
apnews.com
The judge withdrew the order to dissolve the Trump Org in the final judgement.If you want to try and call it that.
I don’t recall the Democratic Fund Raising chest pic posting 74 yr old judge bringing that case up in his attempts to show precedence…Is this just you trying to relate a case? If so, even Democratic legal experts disagree with you. There is a HUGE difference in past cases.
From the liberal left leaning Assoc Press
”ITS THE ONLY BIG BUSINESS FOUND THAT WAS THREATENED WITH A SHUTDOWN WITHOUT A SHOWING OF OBVIOUS VICTIMS AND MAJOR LOSSES”
Dissolving Trump's business empire would stand apart in history of NY fraud law
AP’s review of nearly 150 cases since New York’s “repeated fraud” statute was passed showed that nearly every previous time a company was taken away, victims and losses were key factors.
Can you find me another example where someone who was absolutely found guilty of fraud over years not only refused to accept any responsibility or agree to organizational changes, he aggressively attacked the judge and prosecutor through out the process. A lack of remorse or contrition and the likelihood of reoffending play a role in determining the penalty size.
As I said elsewhere, Trump has a lifetime of business history that led to everything that’s happening to him this year. $355m may be too large of an award, but Trump is very far from an innocent victim here.
Trump’s hubris has brought about the downfall of his family’s business empire | Sidney Blumenthal
Even the fortune Trump inherited from his father did not stop him from steering the family’s dynasty on to the rocks
Answering with a question does not answer my question or provide evidence of your statement…You still are failing to show a case..like I said ..again, you can’t…you said you could and you can’t…and as hard as every liberal legal mind has tried, they can’t either ..thus the reason why so many are skeptical on the ruling and the political precedence it sets for the futureCan you find me another example where someone who was absolutely found guilty of fraud over years not only refused to accept any responsibility or agree to organizational changes, he aggressively attacked the judge and prosecutor through out the process. A lack of remorse or contrition and the likelihood of reoffending play a role in determining the penalty size.
As I said elsewhere, Trump has a lifetime of business history that led to everything that’s happening to him this year. $355m may be too large of an award, but Trump is very far from an innocent victim here.
Trump’s hubris has brought about the downfall of his family’s business empire | Sidney Blumenthal
Even the fortune Trump inherited from his father did not stop him from steering the family’s dynasty on to the rockswww.theguardian.com
My post wasn’t in response to you, but ok.
Lack of remorse (as well as total net worth) are important factors in determining the appropriateness of a civil judgement like this where the penalty is supposed to act as a deterrent to future similar behavior. Trump essentially decided that his approach to this trial was to publically proclaim, early and often, f&ck this judge, f&ck this DA and f&ck this court. That may play well politically, but it doesn’t show the judge that Trump has any interest in accepting or changing his fraudulent behavior, a point he detailed in his judgement. That is in fact highly relevant to what the judge decided.
Reminder, this all started because Trump’s personal lawyer detailed the extent of the Trump Org’s fraudulent bookkeeping, under oath and in front of Congress. Every single accusation made by Coen was validated by the evidence in trial.
Also, the IRS is definitely coming for Trump. This trial was only focused on the intentional overstating of values to aid with loans. You know Trump did the exact same thing in reverse when he filed his taxes. Its almost certainly one of the big reasons he refused to release his taxes for so long.
Trump is a lifelong scammer, and also a shitty businessman. If he hadn’t cooked his books for years he wouldn’t have this issue.
If this judge has been excessively capricious then Trump should have no problem winning a reduced judgment on appeal. It wouldn’t be the first time a huge initial judgement was significantly reduced on appeal.
Last edited:
Ok. $355M “might be” too stiff? Most people worth $2B don’t have near that much in cash. It is a political shit show. And the amount of damages and rationale are embarrassingly bad to anyone trying to defend it.Can you find me another example where someone who was absolutely found guilty of fraud over years not only refused to accept any responsibility or agree to organizational changes, he aggressively attacked the judge and prosecutor through out the process. A lack of remorse or contrition and the likelihood of reoffending play a role in determining the penalty size.
As I said elsewhere, Trump has a lifetime of business history that led to everything that’s happening to him this year. $355m may be too large of an award, but Trump is very far from an innocent victim here.
Trump’s hubris has brought about the downfall of his family’s business empire | Sidney Blumenthal
Even the fortune Trump inherited from his father did not stop him from steering the family’s dynasty on to the rocks
