Democrats kill me....

[VikingDawg2]

they preach love and peace! As soon as they don't get their way, they riot, burn and destroy things!

They are now saying Trump needs to fix it! Heck he is not President yet! Give him some time! Looking for law and order to come back to America ! Lock them and her up!

It was funny the other night when they ask a rioter why he was there and he had no idea! Democrats are really strange people!

 

[Hoffman_rg]

they preach love and peace! As soon as they don't get their way, they riot, burn and destroy things!

They are now saying Trump needs to fix it! Heck he is not President yet! Give him some time! Looking for law and order to come back to America ! Lock them and her up!

It was funny the other night when they ask a rioter why he was there and he had no idea! Democrats are really strange people!

That rioter knew why he was there--to get paid.

 

[SLC_Dawg]

they preach love and peace! As soon as they don't get their way, they riot, burn and destroy things!

They are now saying Trump needs to fix it! Heck he is not President yet! Give him some time! Looking for law and order to come back to America ! Lock them and her up!

It was funny the other night when they ask a rioter why he was there and he had no idea! Democrats are really strange people!

He was there for the free TVs.

 

[Trim-man]

they preach love and peace! As soon as they don't get their way, they riot, burn and destroy things!

They are now saying Trump needs to fix it! Heck he is not President yet! Give him some time! Looking for law and order to come back to America ! Lock them and her up!

It was funny the other night when they ask a rioter why he was there and he had no idea! Democrats are really strange people!

Maybe they are just doing what Trump advocated 4 years when he tweeted after the election the country should march on DC and called the electoral college stupid and outdated.

 

[d-dawg]

Maybe they are just doing what Trump advocated 4 years when he tweeted after the election the country should march on DC and called the electoral college stupid and outdated.

That is correct. He said "march".

 

[Trim-man]

That rioter knew why he was there--to get paid.

OR maybe they were just rioting like the reps did in fla in 2000 but I'm sure that's OK with this crowd.

 

[gawga_dawg]

Conservatives kill me. Thy claim to be christians, yet they're racist, homophobic, and xenophobic as hell. Their morals are negotiable. They also elected a vile sexual predator who is also a bigot, a homophobe, and a sociopath. Jesus would be ashamed and embarrassed of these people.

 

[atlanta cock#]

Conservatives kill me. Thy claim to be christians, yet they're racist, homophobic, and xenophobic as hell. Their morals are negotiable. They also elected a vile sexual predator who is also a bigot, a homophobe, and a sociopath. Jesus would be ashamed and embarrassed of these people.

You lie! There are Jewish conservatives who are not racist, homophobic, and xenophobic as hell.

 

[VikingDawg2]

Conservatives kill me. Thy claim to be christians, yet they're racist, homophobic, and xenophobic as hell. Their morals are negotiable. They also elected a vile sexual predator who is also a bigot, a homophobe, and a sociopath. Jesus would be ashamed and embarrassed of these people.

Many of us Christians prayed for a Trump victory! Our prayers were answered! The Lord knew America was going down the tubes with you Liberals! The Lord is still in charge around here!

 

[dawgsfan1973]

Conservatives kill me. Thy claim to be christians, yet they're racist, homophobic, and xenophobic as hell. Their morals are negotiable. They also elected a vile sexual predator who is also a bigot, a homophobe, and a sociopath. Jesus would be ashamed and embarrassed of these people.

I need to call all of my Black and Jewish friends that voted for Trump and let them know that they hate themselves. Thanks for the heads up.

 

[Trim-man]

Many of us Christians prayed for a Trump victory! Our prayers were answered! The Lord knew America was going down the tubes with you Liberals! The Lord is still in charge around here!

I would personally like to thank Trump for keeping pre-existing conditions and staying on parents insurance until 26.

 

[wayxpython]

I would personally like to thank Trump for keeping pre-existing conditions and staying on parents insurance until 26.

Would like to see President Trump assign Mayor Rudolph Giuliani as the Special Prosecutor in the Hillary Rodham Clinton espionage case. GO 'DOGS!

 

[Trim-man]

Would like to see President Trump assign Mayor Rudolph Giuliani as the Special Prosecutor in the Hillary Rodham Clinton espionage case. GO 'DOGS!

Ain't happening. That will be another promise he will break along with obamacare and the wall. He's already said he wants to keep the preexisting conditions and staying on parents insurance until 26. He sold y'all a bill of goods that he has no intention of delivering.

 

[wayxpython]

He sold y'all a bill of goods that he has no intention of delivering.

As long as President Trump lowers my taxes, keeps America out of World War III, and leaves my Tri-Care alone.....I'm kool.

 

[PotimusWillie]

Maybe they are just doing what Trump advocated 4 years when he tweeted after the election the country should march on DC and called the electoral college stupid and outdated.

A march or anarchy?

What we are witnessing now is anarchy. A little money with a few slogans mixed in and you can fuel anarchy.

What us fascinating is the total ignore of the vulgarity and properyt damage of the protests by the media, yet tonight there was a report on the news about some high school kid getting a racist note from a classmate which shows how divided we are and how much hate is coming from the Trump supporters . .........

It really couldn't get any dumber.

 

[PotimusWillie]

I would personally like to thank Trump for keeping pre-existing conditions and staying on parents insurance until 26.

He must be a pretty powerful man. Hasn't been sworn in yet and is already making these hard decisions, amazing.

Trim, you are so easy to read. We knew you would start the compromise jabs. It's all you have.

I hold judgement on any decisions until he is sworn in. But other than political speak right now, he won't fan any flames.

There is much he can't do overnight. The issues that need fixing weren't created overnight.

It's hard to clean out the garbage can before you empty the trash.

Lower taxes and give industry incentive to grow. The rest will work itself out.

 

[Trim-man]

He must be a pretty powerful man. Hasn't been sworn in yet and is already making these hard decisions, amazing.

Trim, you are so easy to read. We knew you would start the compromise jabs. It's all you have.

I hold judgement on any decisions until he is sworn in. But other than political speak right now, he won't fan any flames.

There is much he can't do overnight. The issues that need fixing weren't created overnight.

It's hard to clean out the garbage can before you empty the trash.

Lower taxes and give industry incentive to grow. The rest will work itself out.

Your right, he can't do it now but he has said he will keep them. He must have thought obamacare wasn't so bad after all.

 

[PotimusWillie]

Conservatives kill me. Thy claim to be christians, yet they're racist, homophobic, and xenophobic as hell. Their morals are negotiable. They also elected a vile sexual predator who is also a bigot, a homophobe, and a sociopath. Jesus would be ashamed and embarrassed of these people.

Would Jesus be proud of Bill and Hillary?

Oh, and since you brought up Jesus, you reckon he grieves over the liberal use of abortion? Just curious. I am suppose to love everyone, right?

Reckon he enjoys seeing his creation murder defenseless babies in the womb that he knows?

Reckon they will ever see their mothers in Heaven? The babies will be there.

But heck, if I have an opinion that it's wrong to deny a man the right to use a woman's restroom I am evil.........classic!

 

[PotimusWillie]

Your right, he can't do it now but he has said he will keep them. He must have thought obamacare wasn't so bad after all.

That is like saying you were given dirty water to drink after being trapped in the desert for 40 days without water.

You drink it in the short term, then find a way to clean it up so you can survive the long term.

Obamacare wasn't built in a day and cannot be fixed in a day.

Honestly, from an actuarial standpoint, the pre-existing clauses were one of the few things that keep medical insurance affordable. Every program I have seen that promised coverage for pre-existing has had trouble, and that is prior to Obamacare.

Insurance actuarial calculations are made to allow the insurance program to be self sustaining. When you throw in actuarial anomalies, you bastardize the structure to the point that it cannot sustain balance. Then you end up screwing the very people you are trying to protect.

Have a plan with normal limitations that people understand and move on.

Whose fault is it that someone is uninsured? If the person that is uninsured has a car, house or apartment, TV, cell phone and drinks at parties, then that person has no excuse for being uninsured. That person makes a choice to be frivolous with finances. No government program can fix ignorance or irresponsibility.

 

[mikul1]

OR maybe they were just rioting like the reps did in fla in 2000 but I'm sure that's OK with this crowd.

they did not riot, you just lie, that is the problem with Dems you guys just lie about everything.

 

[Trim-man]

they did not riot, you just lie, that is the problem with Dems you guys just lie about everything.

I don't believe you are lying, I think you're just stupid. Look it up.

 

[Trim-man]

That is like saying you were given dirty water to drink after being trapped in the desert for 40 days without water.

You drink it in the short term, then find a way to clean it up so you can survive the long term.

Obamacare wasn't built in a day and cannot be fixed in a day.

Honestly, from an actuarial standpoint, the pre-existing clauses were one of the few things that keep medical insurance affordable. Every program I have seen that promised coverage for pre-existing has had trouble, and that is prior to Obamacare.

Insurance actuarial calculations are made to allow the insurance program to be self sustaining. When you throw in actuarial anomalies, you bastardize the structure to the point that it cannot sustain balance. Then you end up screwing the very people you are trying to protect.

Have a plan with normal limitations that people understand and move on.

Whose fault is it that someone is uninsured? If the person that is uninsured has a car, house or apartment, TV, cell phone and drinks at parties, then that person has no excuse for being uninsured. That person makes a choice to be frivolous with finances. No government program can fix ignorance or irresponsibility.

No it's not. He has now gone on record as saying he will keep both. Your analogy is really lacking.

 

[PotimusWillie]

No it's not. He has now gone on record as saying he will keep both. Your analogy is really lacking.

Let me give you this.

The liberal formula

"Propaganda must always address itself to the broad masses of the people. All propaganda must be presented in a popular form and must fix its intellectual level so as not to be above the heads of the least intellectual of those to whom it is directed. The art of propaganda consists precisely in being able to awaken the imagination of the public through an appeal to their feelings, in finding the appropriate psychological form that will arrest the attention and appeal to the hearts of the national masses. The broad masses of the people are not made up of diplomats or professors of public jurisprudence nor simply of persons who are able to form reasoned judgment in given cases, but a vacillating crowd of human children who are constantly wavering between one idea and another. The great majority of a nation is so feminine in its character and outlook that its thought and conduct are ruled by sentiment rather than by sober reasoning. This sentiment, however, is not complex, but simple and consistent. It is not highly differentiated, but has only the negative and positive notions of love and hatred, right and wrong, truth and falsehood."

As to the methods to be employed:

"Propaganda must not investigate the truth objectively and, in so far as it is favorable to the other side, present it according to the theoretical rules of justice; yet it must present only that aspect of the truth which is favorable to its own side. The receptive powers of the masses are very restricted, and their understanding is feeble. On the other hand, they quickly forget. Such being the case, all effective propaganda must be confined to a few bare essentials and those must be expressed as far as possible in stereotyped formulas. These slogans should be persistently repeated until the very last individual has come to grasp the idea that has been put forward. Every change that is made in the subject of a propagandist message must always emphasize the same conclusion. The leading slogan must of course be illustrated in many ways and from several angles, but in the end one must always return to the assertion of the same formula."

Political parties are prone to enter compromises; but a philosophy never does this. A political party is inclined to adjust its teachings with a view to meeting those of its opponents, but a philosophy proclaims its own infallibility.

In the beginning, political parties have also and nearly always the intention of securing an exclusive and despotic domination for themselves. They always show a slight tendency to become philosophical. But the limited nature of their program is in itself enough to rob them of that heroic spirit which a philosophy demands. The spirit of conciliation which animates their will attracts those petty and chicken-hearted people who are not fit to be protagonists in any crusade. That is the reason why they mostly become struck in their miserable pettiness very early on the march. They give up fighting for their ideology and, by way of what they call 'positive collaboration,' they try as quickly as possible to wedge themselves into some tiny place at the trough of the existent regime and to stick there as long as possible. Their whole effort ends at that. And if they should get shouldered away from the common manger by a competition of more brutal manners then their only idea is to force themselves in again, by force or chicanery, among the herd of all the others who have similar appetites, in order to get back into the front row, and finally – even at the expense of their most sacred convictions – participate anew in that beloved spot where they find their fodder. They are the jackals of politics.

But a general philosophy of life will never share its place with something else. Therefore it can never agree to collaborate in any order of things that it condemns. On the contrary it feels obliged to employ every means in fighting against the old order and the whole world of ideas belonging to that order and prepare the way for its destruction.

These purely destructive tactics, the danger of which is so readily perceived by the enemy that he forms a united front against them for his common defense, and also the constructive tactics, which must be aggressive in order to carry the new world of ideas to success – both these phases of the struggle call for a body of resolute fighters. Any new philosophy of life will bring its ideas to victory only if the most courageous and active elements of its epoch and its people are enrolled under its standards and grouped firmly together in a powerful fighting organization. To achieve this purpose it is absolutely necessary to select from the general system of doctrine a certain number of ideas which will appeal to such individuals and which, once they are expressed in a precise and clear-cut form, will serve as articles of faith for a new association of men. While the programm of the ordinary political party is nothing but the recipe for cooking up favorable results out of the next general elections, the program of a philosophy represents a declaration of war against an existing order of things, against present conditions, in short, against the established view of life in general.

It is not necessary, however, that every individual fighter for such a new doctrine need have a full grasp of the ultimate ideas and plans of those who are the leaders of the movement. It is only necessary that each should have a clear notion of the fundamental ideas and that he should thoroughly assimilate a few of the most fundamental principles, so that he will be convinced of the necessity of carrying the movement and its doctrines to success. The individual soldier is not initiated in the knowledge of high strategical plans. But he is trained to submit to a rigid discipline, to be passionately convinced of the justice and inner worth of his cause and that he must devote himself to it without reserve. So, too, the individual follower of a movement must be made acquainted with its far-reaching purpose, how it is inspired by a powerful will and has a great future before it.

All of that taken from Mein Kampf

Liberal propaganda promotes liberal ideology by demonizing the enemies of the Democrat Party, especially evangelical Christians, but also capitalists and intellectuals. The campaign against Christians is especially pernicious, and is a direct result of the influence on liberal policy. Holding Christians as hateful if they do not agree with liberal approach. Promoting policy to protect sovereignty of citizens is considered racial hate. The mantra of taking each defensible rebuttal down a long rabbit hole of questions and concerns, such as pro life is hating women, regardless of the murder of a human life. Enforcing immigration laws is racist and hateful, though it protects the sovereignty and financial integrity of its citizens, who pay for the policies. The government pays nothing, yet makes the rules.

The opinion to not agree is seen as hate.

What we are seeing in the streets right now is the propaganda policies used so successfully by the Nazi regime in Germany. The same type of indoctrination and motivation to push forward, regardless of truth.

 

[Trim-man]

Let me give you this.

The liberal formula

"Propaganda must always address itself to the broad masses of the people. All propaganda must be presented in a popular form and must fix its intellectual level so as not to be above the heads of the least intellectual of those to whom it is directed. The art of propaganda consists precisely in being able to awaken the imagination of the public through an appeal to their feelings, in finding the appropriate psychological form that will arrest the attention and appeal to the hearts of the national masses. The broad masses of the people are not made up of diplomats or professors of public jurisprudence nor simply of persons who are able to form reasoned judgment in given cases, but a vacillating crowd of human children who are constantly wavering between one idea and another. The great majority of a nation is so feminine in its character and outlook that its thought and conduct are ruled by sentiment rather than by sober reasoning. This sentiment, however, is not complex, but simple and consistent. It is not highly differentiated, but has only the negative and positive notions of love and hatred, right and wrong, truth and falsehood."

As to the methods to be employed:

"Propaganda must not investigate the truth objectively and, in so far as it is favorable to the other side, present it according to the theoretical rules of justice; yet it must present only that aspect of the truth which is favorable to its own side. The receptive powers of the masses are very restricted, and their understanding is feeble. On the other hand, they quickly forget. Such being the case, all effective propaganda must be confined to a few bare essentials and those must be expressed as far as possible in stereotyped formulas. These slogans should be persistently repeated until the very last individual has come to grasp the idea that has been put forward. Every change that is made in the subject of a propagandist message must always emphasize the same conclusion. The leading slogan must of course be illustrated in many ways and from several angles, but in the end one must always return to the assertion of the same formula."

Political parties are prone to enter compromises; but a philosophy never does this. A political party is inclined to adjust its teachings with a view to meeting those of its opponents, but a philosophy proclaims its own infallibility.

In the beginning, political parties have also and nearly always the intention of securing an exclusive and despotic domination for themselves. They always show a slight tendency to become philosophical. But the limited nature of their program is in itself enough to rob them of that heroic spirit which a philosophy demands. The spirit of conciliation which animates their will attracts those petty and chicken-hearted people who are not fit to be protagonists in any crusade. That is the reason why they mostly become struck in their miserable pettiness very early on the march. They give up fighting for their ideology and, by way of what they call 'positive collaboration,' they try as quickly as possible to wedge themselves into some tiny place at the trough of the existent regime and to stick there as long as possible. Their whole effort ends at that. And if they should get shouldered away from the common manger by a competition of more brutal manners then their only idea is to force themselves in again, by force or chicanery, among the herd of all the others who have similar appetites, in order to get back into the front row, and finally – even at the expense of their most sacred convictions – participate anew in that beloved spot where they find their fodder. They are the jackals of politics.

But a general philosophy of life will never share its place with something else. Therefore it can never agree to collaborate in any order of things that it condemns. On the contrary it feels obliged to employ every means in fighting against the old order and the whole world of ideas belonging to that order and prepare the way for its destruction.

These purely destructive tactics, the danger of which is so readily perceived by the enemy that he forms a united front against them for his common defense, and also the constructive tactics, which must be aggressive in order to carry the new world of ideas to success – both these phases of the struggle call for a body of resolute fighters. Any new philosophy of life will bring its ideas to victory only if the most courageous and active elements of its epoch and its people are enrolled under its standards and grouped firmly together in a powerful fighting organization. To achieve this purpose it is absolutely necessary to select from the general system of doctrine a certain number of ideas which will appeal to such individuals and which, once they are expressed in a precise and clear-cut form, will serve as articles of faith for a new association of men. While the programm of the ordinary political party is nothing but the recipe for cooking up favorable results out of the next general elections, the program of a philosophy represents a declaration of war against an existing order of things, against present conditions, in short, against the established view of life in general.

It is not necessary, however, that every individual fighter for such a new doctrine need have a full grasp of the ultimate ideas and plans of those who are the leaders of the movement. It is only necessary that each should have a clear notion of the fundamental ideas and that he should thoroughly assimilate a few of the most fundamental principles, so that he will be convinced of the necessity of carrying the movement and its doctrines to success. The individual soldier is not initiated in the knowledge of high strategical plans. But he is trained to submit to a rigid discipline, to be passionately convinced of the justice and inner worth of his cause and that he must devote himself to it without reserve. So, too, the individual follower of a movement must be made acquainted with its far-reaching purpose, how it is inspired by a powerful will and has a great future before it.

All of that taken from Mein Kampf

Liberal propaganda promotes liberal ideology by demonizing the enemies of the Democrat Party, especially evangelical Christians, but also capitalists and intellectuals. The campaign against Christians is especially pernicious, and is a direct result of the influence on liberal policy. Holding Christians as hateful if they do not agree with liberal approach. Promoting policy to protect sovereignty of citizens is considered racial hate. The mantra of taking each defensible rebuttal down a long rabbit hole of questions and concerns, such as pro life is hating women, regardless of the murder of a human life. Enforcing immigration laws is racist and hateful, though it protects the sovereignty and financial integrity of its citizens, who pay for the policies. The government pays nothing, yet makes the rules.

The opinion to not agree is seen as hate.

What we are seeing in the streets right now is the propaganda policies used so successfully by the Nazi regime in Germany. The same type of indoctrination and motivation to push forward, regardless of truth.

Here's a idea for you. Since you think we are turning into nazi Germany (I think you're bat crazy but that's another subject) maybe you should seek our another country just for back up you know. I don't know where you get your ideas (Brietbart I expect) but they're whacky. I'm also assuming you are retired since you write books all day.

 

[Hoffman_rg]

Here's a idea for you. Since you think we are turning into nazi Germany (I think you're bat crazy but that's another subject) maybe you should seek our another country just for back up you know. I don't know where you get your ideas (Brietbart I expect) but they're whacky. I'm also assuming you are retired since you write books all day.

Trim,

You keep calling out Breitbart as wacky far left, etc. You must think the NYT (who admitted today they were biased against Trump) is moderate right.? What news source(s) do you consider to be truthful and unbiased?.

 

[wayxpython]

What news source(s) do you consider to be truthful and unbiased?.

If I was a gambling man, based on his post, I would say the International Socialist Review and New Politics. In fact, I think the blonde jumping rope is Trim.

 

[Trim-man]

Trim,

You keep calling out Breitbart as wacky far left, etc. You must think the NYT (who admitted today they were biased against Trump) is moderate right.? What news source(s) do you consider to be truthful and unbiased?.

No, I think they are wacky far right. I don't read nyt but I will base it on a couple of quotes.
Bannon said Breitbart is "the platform for the alt right".
David Duke said "Bannon is a great choice".
That's all I need to know.

 

[Hoffman_rg]

No, I think they are wacky far right.

Yet all the main street media sources basically have admitted like the NYT they were biased against Trump, helped Hil with debate questions, asked for permission to use headlines, articles written, etc. All to help Hil beat Trump. You talk all the time about false articles yet the media you read is biased and dishonest and have admitted it after the election. Are you saying that it is ok to be dishonest if the source are liberal?

 

[Trim-man]

Yet all the main street media sources basically have admitted like the NYT they were biased against Trump, helped Hil with debate questions, asked for permission to use headlines, articles written, etc. All to help Hil beat Trump. You talk all the time about false articles yet the media you read is biased and dishonest and have admitted it after the election. Are you saying that it is ok to be dishonest if the source are liberal?

Which all main street news sources have said they were biased against trump? What do you think about Bannon saying Breitbart is the platform for the alt right?

 

[PotimusWillie]

Here's a idea for you. Since you think we are turning into nazi Germany (I think you're bat crazy but that's another subject) maybe you should seek our another country just for back up you know. I don't know where you get your ideas (Brietbart I expect) but they're whacky. I'm also assuming you are retired since you write books all day.

We are turning into Nazi Germany? Really? Who said that?

Dang, just when I thought it was safe to go to a Jewish bakery.

Honestly, whoever said we are turning into Nazi germany must be nuts. I know we are being used in the way of propaganda, like Goebbels did in the 1930's. I mean textbook propraganda.

The wikileaks emails substantiated the disdain the DNC had for the voter, other than to get the vote. Textbook.

Enjoy your day trim. I will back away again from the chat and let you ramble on. You really are an idealist with no ability to see anything other than your mantra. There is no discussion on points of validity, only the belief that you are right.

You probably have something good to say, but you just defend your movement.

 

[PotimusWillie]

Conservatives kill me. Thy claim to be christians, yet they're racist, homophobic, and xenophobic as hell. Their morals are negotiable. They also elected a vile sexual predator who is also a bigot, a homophobe, and a sociopath. Jesus would be ashamed and embarrassed of these people.

Why are Christians racist? Why are Christians homophobic and xenophobic?

Why are Christians morals negotiable?

Why is Trump a bigot, homophobe and sociopath? What makes him a sexual predator?

Just interested in your selective views.

 

[Trim-man]

Why are Christians racist? Why are Christians homophobic and xenophobic?

Why are Christians morals negotiable?

Why is Trump a bigot, homophobe and sociopath? What makes him a sexual predator?

Just interested in your selective views.

Good questions to all those and I wonder the same thing. Why is someone who claims to be Christian be racist at the same time. As far as Trump being a sexually predator if you don't know the reason for that then maybe you didn't watch any news in October or just maybe they didn't mention it on the news you watch.

 

[PotimusWillie]

Good questions to all those and I wonder the same thing. Why is someone who claims to be Christian be racist at the same time. As far as Trump being a sexually predator if you don't know the reason for that then maybe you didn't watch any news in October or just maybe they didn't mention it on the news you watch.

You didn't answer the question, you made a statement of opinion without basis. You are a homophobe because you made insulting remarks about two men supporting each other on this board. That is opinion based on your exact comments. And using your logic.

I asked simple questions. Or are you incapable of anything other than agenda based rants?

I believe I know the answer, but just curious as to your perception of it.

No, I didn't watch the "news" in October. Exactly what is "news"?

 

[mikul1]

No, I think they are wacky far right. I don't read nyt but I will base it on a couple of quotes.
Bannon said Breitbart is "the platform for the alt right".
David Duke said "Bannon is a great choice".
That's all I need to know.

Muslin hate groups that behead people for thinking differently endorsed Hillary you forgot to type that in you post

 

[PotimusWillie]

No it's not. He has now gone on record as saying he will keep both. Your analogy is really lacking.

You had an old car to sell and had to drive it to the new owner. It was nearly out of gas. So you purchased gas to put in it to drive it to the new owner.

Did you put gas in it because you wanted to keep it, or only to transport the vehicle to another location so you could successfully sell it?

Not lacking an analogy at all. I will wait patiently for your well defended reply of "because".

 

[PotimusWillie]

Muslin hate groups that behead people for thinking differently endorsed Hillary you forgot to type that in you post

Truth doesn't play well in this thread. Vague mantra is the recipe for a proper conversation.

You will be suspended without pay for the next 15 mins so you can be retrained.

 

[Hoffman_rg]

Which all main street news sources have said they were biased against trump? What do you think about Bannon saying Breitbart is the platform for the alt right?

I am tired of the labeling that your side does. All you have is name calling. If it weren't for lies, you wouldn't have a party at all. The Alt- leftist media labeled Trump as a racist. Hillary labeled half of Trump supporters as racist a kkk members, homophobic, etc. They are trying to label Bannon as a white supremacist. There frankly is no evidence that Bannon is a white supremacist. I have never heard him talk so I don't jump to conclusions about people like u do. Can you define the alt-right? How many people are alt-right? Are you part of the alt-left?

I can play the guilt by association card like you do. I suppose since the Communist party supports the Dems then the Dems must like Putin and are communists.. Dems support Muslims who mostly are anti-semitic and discriminate against women and gays. So that must mean Dems have similar beliefs.Fair? No, but that is what you do!

There are more examples of anti-semitics and communists in the Democrat party than radicals in the repub party. Obama sat in the pews of reverend Wright who is a black nationalist. Keith Ellison leads the anti-semitic charge. He once worked for Louis Farrakahn who is a black supremacist and jew hater. Van Jones is an avowed communist & was originally a czar in Obama's cabinet and now is on CNN..

 

[Hoffman_rg]

Which all main street news sources have said they were biased against trump? What do you think about Bannon saying Breitbart is the platform for the alt right?[/QUOTE

NYT, Politicol, Washington Post, CNN have all either admitted to helping Clinton. caught on Wikileaks, or by their actions like WAPO sending out 20 investigative reporters to find dirt of DT. None to find something on Hil.

More media sources that support Dems.

The Daily Kos, the Washington Post, FactCheck,
PolitiFact, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, NPR, MoJo, Media Matters The New Yorker, NYT, Moveon.Org,CNN,) CNN: Huffington Post,Time,Slate,Newsweek,U.S. News & World Report,Politico, Salon,Indy Media,The Democratic Underground,The Atlantic,The Village Voice,Eschaton,New Yorker,The Daily Beast,Alternet,Common Dreams, Crooks and Liars,DCCC,Buzzflash,TPM Cafe,Mother Jones,Amnesty
International,Counterpunch,The Nation,Antiwar,Think Progress, Raw Story,The New
Republic,Planned Parenthood,Information Clearing House, What Really Happened,
OpEdNews,Bad Subjects,Political Wire,World Socialist Website, ACLU,
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Media Matters, Feministing,Truthout,
Drudge Retort(NOT REPORT),The American Prospect, Harper’s Magazine,
Firedoglake, TruthDig, Wonkette, AmericaBlog,Honorable Mentions, FiveThirtyEight,The Washington Monthly, Michael Moore, Bartcop, Air America, Oliver Willis, MyDD,Center for American Progress,The Brookings Institute, Zmag,The Southern Poverty Law Center,Chattanooga times, NAACP, Change.Org, Friends of the Earth, Americandownfall.com(Beware!), Mercy for Animals, Center for American Progress, Florida Today, PBS,

Conservative news sources--Breitbart, Fox News, Top Right News, Limbaugh, and Drudge. However, Fox News is more center right and only Hannity at FN is solidly conservative..

 

[Trim-man]

You didn't answer the question, you made a statement of opinion without basis. You are a homophobe because you made insulting remarks about two men supporting each other on this board. That is opinion based on your exact comments. And using your logic.

I asked simple questions. Or are you incapable of anything other than agenda based rants?

I believe I know the answer, but just curious as to your perception of it.

No, I didn't watch the "news" in October. Exactly what is "news"?

Here's the gist of it. Trump said he could grab women by the pussy because he was a star and could get away with it. That's a sexual predator.

 

[Trim-man]

This isn't like The pledge of Allegiance thing is it?