This case is similar to the Brett Kavanaugh hearing, where we were supposed to blindly believe a woman who spoke in the tone of a little girl to elicit sympathy. She had few facts, zero evidence, no eyewitnesses, and contradicted herself numerous times just like with the Kavanaugh accuser. She like in the Kavanaugh case couldn't even give a year of the alleged assault happened which made it impossible to counter. Her legal expenses were paid by a well known billionaire leftist and DT wasn't even allowed to bring this up in court.
In NY, you don't need evidence to convict Donald Trump. He wasn't even given an opportunity to defend himself. These accusations weren't even made until both Trump and Kavanough were considered important for dems to oppose.
Although this recent trial was about defamation, and Carroll chose not to pursue charges of sexual abuse or rape. But the jury hated DT so much the leftist jury and judge convicted Trump of outrageous dollar sum for defamation for only declaring his innocence.
In NY, you don't need evidence to convict Donald Trump. He wasn't even given an opportunity to defend himself. These accusations weren't even made until both Trump and Kavanough were considered important for dems to oppose.
Although this recent trial was about defamation, and Carroll chose not to pursue charges of sexual abuse or rape. But the jury hated DT so much the leftist jury and judge convicted Trump of outrageous dollar sum for defamation for only declaring his innocence.