69 DAYS FOLKS!!! Gettin Closer TFJPS
- The Dawgvent
- 8 Replies
This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.
It would be no different because the old deal wouldn’t have prevented escalation of their nuke program. Why stay in a deal that doesn’t prevent what the purpose of the deal is for?🤦🏿Yes because I've been making the point that had Trump not pulled out of thr JCPOA in 2018 we very well would not be in the position we're in today.
Yeah - never said there weren't any obese people in other parts of the world... but just got back from a 3 week trip to Japan and Thailand. Not a whole lot of obese people there. And if you think any country in Europe has more obese people than the Southeast US... well...Yeah, sure. Knock yourself out. Do the native Hawaiians next. I give these stats as much credence as the Russia hoax. I travel all over the place, and I see plenty of native fatsos in NYC, Denver and Europe. Our media (and during Covid we learned our medical establishment too) is stunningly unreliable and biased. But, you be you.
Come on man. Welker asked if we are at war with Iran. He said we are at war with the nucleur program. Dont try to twist it.Trump last night said we obliterated Iran's nuclear program
Vance today says we are at war with Iran's nuclear program
Which is it? Can't be both.
Those odds were 100% if Iran developed nuclear war heads along with their so called space program. So we will see if Russia is that stupid.and says many countries are sympathetic to Iran’s position and are willing to sell Iran some of their own nuclear warheads.
Have to admit, I did not see that outcome. If we prevent Iran from building nukes, why wouldn’t they just buy them? It’s an unlawful transaction, but who would enforce that?
The USA has now directly struck Iran, not a proxy did like Israel.
I really hope every American is prepared for life after a nuclear detonation in Atlanta, NYC, etc. I think the odds of that are low, but they are greater than zero.
Also, I told everyone that “America first” and “no new wars” as just a ruse. At no point during his first presidential campaign to Donald Trump, promise that no new wars will be started. It was only years after the fact that somebody noticed, purely coincidentally, that we didn’t get involved in the new complex and try to act like Donald Trump caused that. It took less than five months for the United States to start bombing things in the Middle East.
You are quoting a 10 year old article lol
There is a direct through line between Trump pulling us out of the JCPOA and where we are right now. We'd sanctioned the 💩 out of Iran and finally got a good agreement through rigorous monitoring of their nuclear program could ensure they did not get a nuke. They were in compliance with that agreement and no evidence to suggest otherwise but becasue Bibi wanted to bomb Iran he convinced Trump to pull out of the agreement.
So no if you're Iran, what are you supposed to do? Iran agreed to the international monitoring and Trump still renegs on the agreement...of course they are going to try and then build a nuke.
You can only negotiate when both sides want to negotiate. Iran had zero incentive to re-negotiate a deal that greatly benefited themThen you renegotiate the deal to get additional inspection measures in place BEFORE withdrawing from the deal.
Iran would never renegotiate that deal, because they wanted to continue their nuclear program. Thats the entire point and what ultimately led to yesterday's actions.Then you renegotiate the deal to get additional inspection measures in place BEFORE withdrawing from the deal.
It absolutely can be true. We are at war with not allowing Iran have nuclear weapons and last night was a part of not allowing it to happenTrump last night said we obliterated Iran's nuclear program
Vance today says we are at war with Iran's nuclear program
Which is it? Can't be both.
The parliament and President are just figure heads. Everything that happens comes through the Supreme Leader. If he wants to close of the strait then they'll do it. If he doesn't they won't. He's religious zealot with a martyr complex. He's run his country into the dirt with his revolution at gunpoint., I'm sure they'll shut off the strait because this is who he is and he's still using his same playbook after all these decades.We flew B-2s from Missouri that were never detected by Iran. Zero shots or missiles directed at our jets occurred. Zero Iranian aircraft engaged us, much less ever took off. And yet the morons still haven't learned a thing. Oh well. These guys are now talking about impacting the entire world. That'll win hearts and minds. I can only assume the Shah's son is packing his bags bc it looks like he's about to move back to Tehran.
Login to view embedded media
You are quoting a 10 year old article lolAgain not true...even Mattis admitted that Iran was in compliance.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis said on Tuesday Iran was fundamentally in compliance with its nuclear deal, as President Donald Trump's administration weighs whether the 2015 deal serves U.S. security interests.
Trump faces an Oct. 15 deadline for certifying that Iran is complying with the pact, a decision that could sink an agreement strongly supported by the other powers that negotiated it, including Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the European Union.
We've long had concerns about the Iranian nuclear programme and been very clear that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.
"I believe that they fundamentally are. There have been certainly some areas where they were not temporarily in that regard, but overall our intelligence community believes that they have been compliant and the IAEA also says so," Mattis said during a House of Representatives hearing, using an acronym for the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Then you renegotiate the deal to get additional inspection measures in place BEFORE withdrawing from the deal.The deal itself allowed Iran to restrict inspectors from inspecting every site. It was widely criticized when the deal was signed.
Additionally, it didn't restrict ballistic missile development. It was a horrible deal, for these and several other reasons.
Risk, yes - but a calculated one.We shall see, this is a massive risk to take with no benefits and it was done at the behast of a foreign country