This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

MaitlandFloridaDawg said:

Right now I’m basically 80% travel, 10% office, 10% work from home. There is no doubt that from a strictly output standpoint, the office is the most efficient. The other benefit of the office is collaboration that you don’t get working from home. Zoom / Teams isn’t as effective as just stopping by a coworkers office.

Click to expand...

Not to mention a little thing called learning how to interact with people in person. Kind of important. And most learning how to do it is observed. To say nothing about the 50 percent plus who sit on their hands half the day. “So long as they get their work done” is bullshit. Get more done. Make extra calls. Schedule more meetings. Bird dog some more deals. Doesn’t happen on its own.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

TivoliDawg said:

Yes they’re lost. They’re both super old and have grown up in a time where the only way you could do work with in an office.

When employees went full, remote versus in the office, companies, productivity, and profits went up. Not down . Employees are more productive at home

Click to expand...

TivoliDawg said:

Yes they’re lost. They’re both super old and have grown up in a time where the only way you could do work with in an office.

When employees went full, remote versus in the office, companies, productivity, and profits went up. Not down . Employees are more productive at home.

Click to expand...

There may be a few industries where it doesn’t matter. Banking and investment banking sure as hell isn’t one of them. Gotta leave the cabin to kill the Moose. Absolutely no way an analyst level investment banker, private equity, development shop, etc. learns shit sitting at a computer by themselves.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

DawgWCK said:

If Trump would have had any real classified documents we would have heard by now. It would have been leaked to the NYT or CNN. My assumption at this time, he had nothing worth while and Trump was aware as well. Trump doesn’t trust FBI or AG at all and perhaps with good reason

Click to expand...

Yeah, the doc case may have gotten a little more traction if it didn't seem like people that had never been potus had been mishandling classified docs for decades. If DC had insisted that Hillary's home had been raided and her server confiscated before she could have cleaned it "with a cloth?" and that evidence taken to a grand jury, maybe more Trump supporters would have thought he wasn't being singled out. Once it was discovered that Joe had docs in his garage and even Pence had possession of docs, it looked more like a show me the man and I'll show you a crime than a unique national security threat.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.