Yes you have said that you didn't always agree with him, but what we are getting at is that you HATE Trump because he is divisive. Yet you did not hate O, or at least never stated so. The reason we refer back to him is to point out that the things you now HATE, seem to have been fine when it was a dim. Not only did O' do the very things you hate trump for, he was destroying the country in the process, hated the country, caused increased unemployment and hardship for Americans, made us weaker around the world, etc etc etc. While I agree sometimes Mr. Trump is a little overboard and abrasive, at least he loves America, and has made the economy so much better with his policies, and is trying to protect us from outside threats. (closing the border). You do realize that there are now less people on food stamps than anytime in the last 8 yrs (odufus yrs), unemployment for minorities at record lows, and that jobs are being created (full time, not fast food worker jobs) at a much faster pace than under the omen?
Your hatred for the man does not compute. You claim to use logic but what is logical about not hating on a president that hated America, was trying to "fundamentally" destroy the country, was DIVISIVE, caused record unemployment and misery for Americans, wanted illegals to flood the country, and convinced all you dims, that the low employment low economic growth was the "new normal" (those words are a quote from him), and tried to destroy our health care system... This is the problem I have with you... If you said, hey I am a liberal and I agree, I hate America and want us to be a 3rd world country, I wouldn't try to debate with you.. Even if you said I hated O, and I hate Trump, I could say well at least he is consistent... But even though you claim not to be influenced by party or media, you sure sound like a brain washed minion of those.
Just say it. Say O was divisive and T is divisive and I hate them both for the same reason and there is no argument to be had with you.